2024
DOI: 10.3390/mca29020024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coupled Finite-Boundary Element Method for Efficient Dynamic Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction Modeling

Parham Azhir,
Jafar Asgari Marnani,
Mehdi Panji
et al.

Abstract: This paper introduces an innovative approach to numerically model Structure–Soil-Structure Interaction (SSSI) by integrating the Boundary Element Method (BEM) and the Finite Element Method (FEM) in a coupled manner. To assess the accuracy of the proposed method, a comparative study is undertaken, comparing its outcomes with those generated by the conventional FEM technique. Alongside accuracy, the computational efficiency aspect is crucial for the analysis of large-scale SSSI problems. Hence, the computational… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil deformability consequence is assessed employing a "discrete" system of "spring-dashpot-mass" [51] elements, with calculated values specified by Mulliken and Karabalis [51] using the relative calculation formulations providing the required mass, stiffness, and damping coefficients, as shown in Table 2 for reading convenience. In the worldwide literature [25][26][27][28][29], more complicated SSI models can be found, which may need time-consuming and complicated calculations and emphasize soil dynamic behavior. Here, attention is drawn to the nonlinear seismic response of the mixed model perspective with the impact of soil deformability in comparison to the rigid soil assumption.…”
Section: Description Of Case Models and Nlth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil deformability consequence is assessed employing a "discrete" system of "spring-dashpot-mass" [51] elements, with calculated values specified by Mulliken and Karabalis [51] using the relative calculation formulations providing the required mass, stiffness, and damping coefficients, as shown in Table 2 for reading convenience. In the worldwide literature [25][26][27][28][29], more complicated SSI models can be found, which may need time-consuming and complicated calculations and emphasize soil dynamic behavior. Here, attention is drawn to the nonlinear seismic response of the mixed model perspective with the impact of soil deformability in comparison to the rigid soil assumption.…”
Section: Description Of Case Models and Nlth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic "Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI)" [3] is widely identified to be critical in the response of special structures such as bridges [21,22], silos [23], and base-isolated structures [24] and, correspondingly, necessary to consider in their design [3]. Even more complex SSI models are accessible in research works, e.g., [25][26][27], that focus mainly on soil behavior [28,29]; however, they are not discussed here as they are not relevant to the aim of this work. Moreover, research works on usual structures have highlighted a significant impact of the deformability of the ground on the response of usual r/c constructions, as exemplified by [30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%