2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22684-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled phase-field and reactive-transport framework for fracture propagation in poroelastic media

Abstract: We present a novel approach to model hydro-chemo-mechanical responses in rock formations subject to fracture propagation within chemically active rock formations. The framework developed integrates the mechanisms of reactive transport, fluid flow and transport in porous media, and phase-field modelling of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. The solution approach integrates the geochemical package PHREEQC with a finite-element open-source platform, FEniCs. The PHREEQC solver is used to calculate the loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the free CO 2 phase at the CO 2 -brine interface will mix with the formation brine and slowly dissolve in it, leading to solubility trapping. Mineral trapping is another type of trapping mechanism in which chemical interactions between dissolved CO 2 and rock minerals will occur, resulting in mineral precipitation [3,22,23]. These physical and geochemical trapping mechanisms determine the effectiveness of the storage capacity and the fate of CO 2 migration [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the free CO 2 phase at the CO 2 -brine interface will mix with the formation brine and slowly dissolve in it, leading to solubility trapping. Mineral trapping is another type of trapping mechanism in which chemical interactions between dissolved CO 2 and rock minerals will occur, resulting in mineral precipitation [3,22,23]. These physical and geochemical trapping mechanisms determine the effectiveness of the storage capacity and the fate of CO 2 migration [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature is important for applications that involve strong coupling between different physical processes, such as WIPCR. In other fields, many studies utilized this approach to examine complex problems in the subsurface, such as studying carbon dioxide storage, reservoir simulation, reactive transport, , and natural convection in porous media. For instance, Benetatos and Giglio introduced a comprehensive workflow for full-scale reservoir simulation, including multiple data sources . However, GSA has not yet been applied to WIPCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method introduces an already stable and non-buoyant phase into the reservoir, which allows the storage of CO 2 directly by solubility trapping [14][15][16][17][18] . Moreover, water-dissolved CO 2 can also promote the dissolution of divalent metal-bearing silicate minerals leading to the formation of carbonate minerals fixing the injected dissolved gas in the solid-state 17,[19][20][21][22] .The injection of CO 2 -charged water into the subsurface overcomes the slow dissolution of CO 2 into reservoir fluids if injected as a single phase. Although carbon dioxide dissolution into water is fast, and equilibrium is generally assumed for this reaction at the CO 2 -water interface [23][24][25] , in the subsurface the overall dissolution process is slow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method introduces an already stable and non-buoyant phase into the reservoir, which allows the storage of CO 2 directly by solubility trapping [14][15][16][17][18] . Moreover, water-dissolved CO 2 can also promote the dissolution of divalent metal-bearing silicate minerals leading to the formation of carbonate minerals fixing the injected dissolved gas in the solid-state 17,[19][20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%