2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupling technique for non-matching finite element meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
46
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…And the pure mesoscale simulation is generally limited to small specimens since it needs large demand of memory capability and its numerical model is very complex [10]. Thus, a common solution for large scale problems is to use a fine analysis only in the region of interest [23]. For large scale structures, the multi-scale concept is necessary [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the pure mesoscale simulation is generally limited to small specimens since it needs large demand of memory capability and its numerical model is very complex [10]. Thus, a common solution for large scale problems is to use a fine analysis only in the region of interest [23]. For large scale structures, the multi-scale concept is necessary [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can be classified as a variation of the embedded approach, since both reinforcement layout and concrete are discretized initially in an entirely independent and non-conforming way. Coupling finite elements developed by Bitencourt Jr. et al [24] are inserted in the mesh to describe the interaction between reinforcements and concrete. This alternative approach is very appealing since it avoids the need for implementing an algorithm to detect the length of the bar embedded in each "parent" element, as is usually the case in existing embedded approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires nevertheless the meshes to be perturbed at the interface to avoid gaps between curved interface, which renders the approach more complex to implement. Bitencourt et al [10] introduced a new method that assembles Coupling Finite Elements (CFEs) at the interface to build the constraints equation between interfaces Degrees of Freedom (DOFs). This approach was studied for 3D planar, 2D planar or 2D curved interfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%