1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-85473-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Course on Borel Sets

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, eJecttonic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
257
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
257
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As topological spaces these are all Polish: separable and completely metrizable. But it is a theorem of Kuratowski that between any two uncountable Polish spaces there is a Borel isomorphism, a measurable bijection with measurable inverse (see [Sri98,Section 3.3]). Thus from the point of view of the category Meas, these classical spaces are all essentially the same object.…”
Section: The Category Of Measurable Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As topological spaces these are all Polish: separable and completely metrizable. But it is a theorem of Kuratowski that between any two uncountable Polish spaces there is a Borel isomorphism, a measurable bijection with measurable inverse (see [Sri98,Section 3.3]). Thus from the point of view of the category Meas, these classical spaces are all essentially the same object.…”
Section: The Category Of Measurable Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the first property in (52), both integrals in (53) are nonnegative and hence they both must vanish. However, by the second property in (52), the integrand in the rightmost integral is positive on I + ; therefore, this integral cannot vanish unless ω(I + ) = 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recalling that in D(ρ) the energy E λ (u) essentially coincides with the quasi-potential I(h 0 , u), as shown in Lemma 4.1, we can then formulate the following main result of this paper. Theorem 4.2 Suppose that Assumption 2.7 holds, let λ ∈ Λ, let D(κ, ρ) be defined as in (40), and consider the exit time τ defined in (41). Then for any δ > κ we have…”
Section: Exit From the Deterministic Attracting Setmentioning
confidence: 99%