2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A COVID-19 forecasting system using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prove the advancement and superiority of the proposed TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM algorithm, this paper compares it with two classic models (LSTM [ 73 ] and ANFIS [ 74 ]), three state-of-the-art models (VMD-BP [ 75 ], N-Beats [ 76 ], and WT-RVFL [ 77 ]), and time series analysis methods (ARIMA). In addition, in order to prove that residual prediction can effectively improve the model's comprehensive prediction and data analysis accuracy, the proposed TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM was compared with TCN-GRU-DBN-Q.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to prove the advancement and superiority of the proposed TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM algorithm, this paper compares it with two classic models (LSTM [ 73 ] and ANFIS [ 74 ]), three state-of-the-art models (VMD-BP [ 75 ], N-Beats [ 76 ], and WT-RVFL [ 77 ]), and time series analysis methods (ARIMA). In addition, in order to prove that residual prediction can effectively improve the model's comprehensive prediction and data analysis accuracy, the proposed TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM was compared with TCN-GRU-DBN-Q.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results, it can be found that for the number of infections in the UK, India, and the US, model 1 (TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM) has a higher prediction accuracy than model 2 (TCN-GRU-DBN-Q) (MRSE 1 <MRSE 2 , MAE 1 <MAE 2 , MAPE% 1 <MAPE% 2 , ||PCC1|-1|<||PCC2|-1|), which proves that the establishment of an error prediction model is meaningful for improving the prediction accuracy. Furthermore, in order to verify the high forecast accuracy of the proposed hybrid model quantitatively, we propose the prediction performance indices improvement percentages P MAPE% (%), P MAE (%), P RMSE (%) and P pcc (%) to compare and analyze the improvement of the prediction accuracy of the proposed model (TCN-GRU-DBN-Q-SVM) compared with the TCN-GRU-DBN-Q (proposed model without SVM error predictor), LSTM [ 73 ], ANFIS [ 74 ], VMD-BP [ 75 ], N-Beats [ 76 ], WT-RVFL [ 77 ] and ARIMA models. The specific calculation method is as follows: where MAPE% 1 , MAE 1 , RMSE 1 and PCC 1 are forecasting performance indices of the proposed model, while MAPE% 2 , MAE 2 , RMSE 2 and PCC 2 are the indices of the comparison model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are NARANN, ANFIS, HFFA, LSTM, BNN, VAE and SSA. ANFIS has been applied to predict the future number of COVID-19 cases in the United Kingdom [ 56 ] and Malaysia [ 57 ]. In the first study, a parametric comparison has been carried out to obtain the optimal ANFIS model based on model accuracy considering different model parameters.…”
Section: Comparative Study and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was also statistically efficient because to the adoption of a Robust Weibull model based on iterative weighting. Kim Tien Ly [23] predicted the number of COVID-19 cases in the United Kingdom using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model to train the data collected. He worked on various factors of ANFIS to build a successful time-series prediction model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%