51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A criterion for vortex separation on unsteady aerodynamic profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rival et al (2013) defined the occurrence of LEV detachment as the instant at which the rear stagnation point arrives at the trailing edge, since after its arrival, vortices that are generated from the trailing edge are rapidly fed to cut off the LEV and limit its growth. Figure 10 plots the stagnation points at the upper surface of the airfoil for k = 0.25, 0.5, 0.78 and 1.26 at α = 15…”
Section: Lev Growth and Detachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rival et al (2013) defined the occurrence of LEV detachment as the instant at which the rear stagnation point arrives at the trailing edge, since after its arrival, vortices that are generated from the trailing edge are rapidly fed to cut off the LEV and limit its growth. Figure 10 plots the stagnation points at the upper surface of the airfoil for k = 0.25, 0.5, 0.78 and 1.26 at α = 15…”
Section: Lev Growth and Detachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vorticity values are measured at the upper surface, and the reattachment point is assumed to occur at the position where the vorticity changes from positive to negative (Rival et al 2013). Although this is not a rigorous definition of a reattachment point for the unsteady flow, the reattachment point is evolving slowly enough such that the stagnation points evaluated by the instantaneous vorticity field can provide useful information about the regions where the flow converges or diverges.…”
Section: Lev Growth and Detachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen at a temporal location of 4 chords traveled where the 0.25T case has the least well-developed LEV and TEV. A potential explanation for this phenomenon is given by Rival et al [12].The authors investigated the effects of leading edge shape on the formation and separation of the LEV on a plunging airfoil, but what was found was that formation and detachment of the LEV was dominated by the shape of the trailing edge and not the leading edge. Similar to this paper the authors of [12] found that wing upper surfaces that were flatter had greater influence on the reverse shear layer and thus (comparatively) accelerate the evolution of the flowfield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since the bluff body detachment mechanism is characterized by the reattachment point of the LEV arriving at the trailing edge, some studies have demonstrated success in using the chord length to scale the circulation of an LEV [92,52]. However, Widmann…”
Section: Lev Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cleaver et al [27] Rival et al [92] also studied the effect of airfoil shape on the evolution of the flow field, and they too demonstrated that the shape of the leading edge had a noticeable effect on the initial separation of the LEV. However, they went on to show that the growth rate of the LEV was not strongly affected by airfoil shape, thereby characterizing why the vorticity fields remained similar.…”
Section: Effect Of Cross-sectional Shape Of An Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 99%