2012
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2012.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Agency Network Model for Building an Integrated Outreach Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with those of previous studies that found that women-focused social networks and organising groups can be important spaces of self-awareness, agency, and collective efforts at gender equity reform (Hart 2007(Hart , 2008. Likewise, our findings are consistent with those of Kiyama, Lee, and Rhoades (2012) and Kezar (2014) that emphasise the role of personal and professional relationships in enacting organisational change and inspiring critical agency, especially around equity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These findings are consistent with those of previous studies that found that women-focused social networks and organising groups can be important spaces of self-awareness, agency, and collective efforts at gender equity reform (Hart 2007(Hart , 2008. Likewise, our findings are consistent with those of Kiyama, Lee, and Rhoades (2012) and Kezar (2014) that emphasise the role of personal and professional relationships in enacting organisational change and inspiring critical agency, especially around equity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Individual actors within an organization exercise their agency in several ways that alter tasks and relations (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001). These individuals can also collectively transform an organization or a unit given the joint power of their social network (Kiyama et al, 2012).…”
Section: Institutional Funds Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work by the authors and their collaborators (Espino & Lee, ; Kiyama, Lee, & Rhoades, ; Torres‐Olave, , ) has called attention to the complex relationships that students and faculty establish with the spaces they inhabit, and how that shapes their relationships to places and communities. This multifaceted dynamic not only applies to the more tangible communities like family, school and work, but also to imagined communities (Anderson, ; Kanno & Norton, ; Wenger, ) that may be physically and geographically removed from our immediate environment.…”
Section: Multidimensional Subjectivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%