2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2931249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Analysis of Tax Avoidance Schemes in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has therefore been argued that the relevance of the distinctions between unacceptable tax avoidance and tax planning as used in this study is that mass-marketed tax avoidance scheme designers, promoters and taxpayers rely on “blurring” the distinctions to enable their unacceptable tax avoidance scheme to appear to be legitimate tax planning (Otusanya, 2011, 2013; Fullarton, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has therefore been argued that the relevance of the distinctions between unacceptable tax avoidance and tax planning as used in this study is that mass-marketed tax avoidance scheme designers, promoters and taxpayers rely on “blurring” the distinctions to enable their unacceptable tax avoidance scheme to appear to be legitimate tax planning (Otusanya, 2011, 2013; Fullarton, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tax reducing activities do not have clear or distinct boundaries and generally shade from one to the other (Otusanya, 2010(Otusanya, , 2011Fullarton, 2014). Taxpayers often demonstrate a willingness to engage in tax reducing activities of one form or another.…”
Section: Tax Dodgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation