2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00468-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical appraisal of the use of the antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay in defining optimal antioxidant structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
75
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different free radicals were used for the determination of the antioxidant activity causing different reactivity with the phenolic compounds depending on their structure [21]. The ABTS˙+ has low selectivity in reactions with H-atom donors since it is reacting with any hydroxylated aromatics independently on their real antioxidant potential [22][23][24]. In contrast to ABTS˙+, the DPPH does not react with flavonoids, which contain no OH-groups in B-ring as well as with aromatic acids containing only one OH-group [24,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different free radicals were used for the determination of the antioxidant activity causing different reactivity with the phenolic compounds depending on their structure [21]. The ABTS˙+ has low selectivity in reactions with H-atom donors since it is reacting with any hydroxylated aromatics independently on their real antioxidant potential [22][23][24]. In contrast to ABTS˙+, the DPPH does not react with flavonoids, which contain no OH-groups in B-ring as well as with aromatic acids containing only one OH-group [24,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPPH and ABTS, can probably be attributed to the fact that every individual phenol compound contained in wine causes a different response to the specific radical used in the assay (Lachman et al, 2007). Thus the use of a single method cannot provide a comprehensive prediction of the antioxidant efficacy of the different compounds (Arts et al, 2003).…”
Section: Antioxidant Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPPH and ABTS, can probably be attributed to the fact that every individual phenol compound contained in wine causes a different response to the specific radical used in the assay (Lachman et al, 2007). Thus the use of a single method cannot provide a comprehensive prediction of the antioxidant efficacy of the different compounds (Arts et al, 2003).The total antioxidant capacity was performed separately from the skin and seed extracts produced according to the methodology described previously. For the analysis of antioxidant capacity, two analytical methods were used: ABTS (2.2'-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and DPPH (2.2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyphenols-proteins binding may have many kinds of influence in bioavailability depending on the method of intake and amount and the structure [2,3] . Researches have shown that the antioxidant capacity of polyphenols could be modified by the presence of proteins when the experiment carried out in vitro [4,5] . The α-amylase is widely distributed in animal saliva, pancreas, which is acting on starch and cut α-1, 4-bond indiscriminately into maltose, glucose, α-1, 6-bond limit dextrin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%