2003
DOI: 10.4324/9781410607690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family Literacy Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The families' critique of and resistance to school practices signify their resistance to the cultural narratives that frame them as ''deficient'' or ''uncaring'' (Rogers, 2003). These ''alternative discourses,'' however, do not always result in their ''getting somewhere'' in terms of school success (ComptonLilly, 2002, p. 123).…”
Section: Literacy As Critique and Resistance To Inner City Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The families' critique of and resistance to school practices signify their resistance to the cultural narratives that frame them as ''deficient'' or ''uncaring'' (Rogers, 2003). These ''alternative discourses,'' however, do not always result in their ''getting somewhere'' in terms of school success (ComptonLilly, 2002, p. 123).…”
Section: Literacy As Critique and Resistance To Inner City Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fewer of these studies have explored how explicit teaching of the highly patterned language in children's literature promotes awareness of language as a repertoire of choices (e.g., Williams, 1999Williams, , 2000. As an analytic tool in classroom research, SFL supports a nuanced discourse analysis of the textual products and processes of students, usually in combination with ethnographic analyses of the social practices of a discourse community over time (e.g., Rogers, 2003).…”
Section: Sfl As An Analytic and Teaching Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their call for research that attends to connections between home and school as well as to divergences has been taken up by other researchers (e.g. Fecho, 2004;Rogers, 2003;Vasquez, Pease-Alvarez, & Shannon, 1994) and our work aims to contribute to new ways of thinking about variations across contexts rather than strict dichotomies. This is important, because by looking for convergences as well as divergences we may see productive ways to build on everyday language skills.…”
Section: From Language Brokering To Communicative Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 96%