1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring Fracture Toughness: I, Direct Crack Measurements

Abstract: The application of indentation techniques to the evaluation of fracture toughness is examined critically, in two parts. In this first part, attention is focused on an approach which involves direct measurement of Vickers‐produced radial cracks as a function of indentation load. A theoretical basis for the method is first established, in terms of elastic/plastic indentation fracture mechanics. It is thereby asserted that the key to the radial crack response lies in the residual component of the contact field. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

40
2,006
2
47

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,028 publications
(2,095 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
40
2,006
2
47
Order By: Relevance
“…d = d c = 0.5 mm and d v = 0 [8]. Toughness values were determined from crack measurements at Vickers indentations [36]. Crack velocity exponents were obtained from existing cyclic fatigue data on these or similar ceramics [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d = d c = 0.5 mm and d v = 0 [8]. Toughness values were determined from crack measurements at Vickers indentations [36]. Crack velocity exponents were obtained from existing cyclic fatigue data on these or similar ceramics [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectra were obtained by Raman spectrometer XY modular (Dilor) with a CCD4 detector. The excitation source used was an argon laser, model Specra-Physics 265, which used the green line of H v is the relationship between applied load P and the surface area of the diagonals of indentation [22]. Wear tests were carried out under dry sliding conditions using a tribometer ball-on-disk according to ASTM wear testing standard G99-03.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different loads were tested ranging from 10 to 1000 g. For loads lower than 500 g no mechanical parameter could be calculated, since no imprint from the indenter was obtained. Mechanical parameters from indentation tests were determined from the experiments performed with 500 and 1000 g loads, by using the expressions given in [19], following the procedure explained by Rincón and Capel [20]. Experimental errors for Vickers microhardness (H V ), Young modulus (E) and critical stress intensity factor (K IC ) measurements was ±0.5 GPa, ±5 GPa and ±0.1 MPa m 1/2 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%