2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical evaluation of self-interaction chromatography as a predictive tool for the assessment of protein–protein interactions in protein formulation development: A case study of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
52
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
10
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such a better indicator of electrostatic interactions might be a direct quantification of the protein electrostatic properties either by theoretical calculations or by experimental verification using electrophoretic measurements. The latter would be more preferred as some commonly-used buffers or salts neutralize protein electrostatic properties [40,41,46,72], which would not be reflected by a theoretical calculation. More importantly, we have provided examples where aggregation does not correlate with conformational stability and native-state protein-protein interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such a better indicator of electrostatic interactions might be a direct quantification of the protein electrostatic properties either by theoretical calculations or by experimental verification using electrophoretic measurements. The latter would be more preferred as some commonly-used buffers or salts neutralize protein electrostatic properties [40,41,46,72], which would not be reflected by a theoretical calculation. More importantly, we have provided examples where aggregation does not correlate with conformational stability and native-state protein-protein interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decreasing k D value is often correlated with increased aggregation propensity when reducing electrostatic repulsion by increasing ionic strength or using a salt or buffer ion that neutralizes protein charge [35,46,57,74,78,82,19,46,63,77,81]. Consistent with these studies, for the wild-type, SB and DSV mutants, the relative rates of aggregate growth (as reflected by the corresponding T SLS ⁄ values) and protein-protein interactions (as reflected by the k D values) decrease non-specifically upon addition of NaCl due to screening of electrostatic interactions.…”
Section: Correlations Between K D and Aggregation Propensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the initial popularity of light scattering for determining second virial coefficients as a means of identifying conditions conducive to protein crystallization [8−10], the method has been largely supplanted by self-interaction chromatography [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]79] − a technique more compatible M A N U S C R I P T…”
Section: Self-interaction Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Ideally, antibodies with self-interaction tendancies could be rapidly eliminated early in the discovery stage, with minimum material consumption, to minimize downstream risks. This screening process is usually performed by low to medium throughput assays such as selfinteraction chromatography (SIC) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] or cross-interaction chromatography (CIC). [14][15][16] SIC measures the retention time of an antibody as it flows across a column conjugated with the same antibody of interest (or "self").…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%