1992
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560440515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical examination of H‐bonding interactions calculated using the AM1 molecular orbital method

Abstract: AM^ calculations for various intermolecular and internally hydrogen-bonding species are compared with experiment. The calculations generally provide a useful, but not perfect, means for modeling H-bonds. The average stabilization energy for 33 gas-phase hydrations of ions was 1.4, whereas that for amination of 10 ions was 4.2 kcal/mol, too weak when compared to experimental results. H-bonding distances have a tendency to be long. The tendency of AM^ to predict multicentered H-bonds is discussed in the context … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial calculations on hydrated merocyanines which contain hydrogen bonds between the oxygen of the merocyanine and one or two water molecules at the AM1/COSMO level in water (ε = 78.4) gave only weakly bonded complexes with O16···H 2 O distances of around 2.10 Å versus distances of approximately 1.57 and 1.75 Å found in the hydrated crystal structure. (This overestimation of the intermolecular hydrogen-bonding distances is a weakness of the AM1 method which extends also to the intramolecular hydrogen-bonding distances found between the phenolic hydrogen and either the carbonyl oxygen in salicylaldehyde or the imino nitrogen in salicylaldoxime, with calculated values of 2.02 and 2.11 Å, respectively, versus experimental values of 1.70 and 1.83 Å, respectively 54,55 .)
4 Calculated ground and first excited state energies (kcal mol -1 ) for merocyanine 1 in acetone (2), N , N -dimethylformamide (3), dimethyl sulfoxide (4), and ethylene carbonate (5) relative to the values calculated in pyridine (1).
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Initial calculations on hydrated merocyanines which contain hydrogen bonds between the oxygen of the merocyanine and one or two water molecules at the AM1/COSMO level in water (ε = 78.4) gave only weakly bonded complexes with O16···H 2 O distances of around 2.10 Å versus distances of approximately 1.57 and 1.75 Å found in the hydrated crystal structure. (This overestimation of the intermolecular hydrogen-bonding distances is a weakness of the AM1 method which extends also to the intramolecular hydrogen-bonding distances found between the phenolic hydrogen and either the carbonyl oxygen in salicylaldehyde or the imino nitrogen in salicylaldoxime, with calculated values of 2.02 and 2.11 Å, respectively, versus experimental values of 1.70 and 1.83 Å, respectively 54,55 .)
4 Calculated ground and first excited state energies (kcal mol -1 ) for merocyanine 1 in acetone (2), N , N -dimethylformamide (3), dimethyl sulfoxide (4), and ethylene carbonate (5) relative to the values calculated in pyridine (1).
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The applicability of the AM 1 method to H-bonding studies has been reviewed elsewhere. 18 The AMI method has previously been used with success in several hydrogen-bonding studies19 including modeling of the H-bonding between molecules of various nitroanilines in the crystalline state. 2 We explicitly considered all internal coordinates for the semiempirical optimizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ß • was equalized to ß -• Geometry optimization was obtained by means of AMI, using MOP AC (A General Molecular Orbital Package, QCPE 455, version 4.10). The method provides a reliable evaluation of hydrogen-bonded systems (Dewar et al, 1985; ; Ventura et al, 1989;Dannenberg & Evlet, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%