2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical examination of the DPPH method: Mistakes and inconsistencies in stoichiometry and IC50 determination by UV–Vis spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction of the stable radical DPPH· with various antioxidant compounds from the papaya extracts is presented in Figure 2 . Antioxidant compounds such as ascorbic acid, ferulic acid, and myricetin react with DPPH· in order to generate the neutral compound DPPH-H (2,2-diphenyl-1-pycrylhydrazine) and other radical intermediates, which are further transformed in neutral degradation compounds [ 41 , 42 ]. Only DPPH· radical has significant absorbance at 517 nm, while the neutral compounds do not absorb in this region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reaction of the stable radical DPPH· with various antioxidant compounds from the papaya extracts is presented in Figure 2 . Antioxidant compounds such as ascorbic acid, ferulic acid, and myricetin react with DPPH· in order to generate the neutral compound DPPH-H (2,2-diphenyl-1-pycrylhydrazine) and other radical intermediates, which are further transformed in neutral degradation compounds [ 41 , 42 ]. Only DPPH· radical has significant absorbance at 517 nm, while the neutral compounds do not absorb in this region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only DPPH· radical has significant absorbance at 517 nm, while the neutral compounds do not absorb in this region. The maximum absorbance of DPPH· is shifted to a much lower value after these reactions (<450 nm [ 41 , 42 ]). On the other hand, papaya extracts do not have significant absorbance at 517 nm (e.g., ascorbic acid has a maximum absorbance in the UV region at 243 nm, ferulic acid at 291 and 321 nm, while myricetin has a maximum absorbance at 328 nm [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antioxidant activity quantification can be deduced from the half-maximal inhibitory capacity when challenged by DPPH radicals. The IC50 value is inversely proportional to the sample's scavenging free radicals [42,43]. Regardless of the variability and its consistency, sun drying is still the most popular method cost-wise.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the color changes from purple to yellow, the stable free radical DPPH displays an electrical absorption band limit at 517 nm. When the odd electron of the DPPH radical is combined with hydrogen from a free radical scavenging antioxidant to form reduced DPPH, the absorption band narrows [26]. A 0.3mM DPPH solution was produced in DMSO and applied to the ligand in 1mL at different concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 µg/mL).…”
Section: Dpph Radical Scavenging Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%