2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0885-2006(01)00073-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical meta-analysis of all evaluations of state-funded preschool from 1977 to 1998: implications for policy, service delivery and program evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
79
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effect sizes exceed those reported for other statefunded pre-K programs, which range from .23-.53 (Gilliam & Zigler, 2001), 10 and for pre-K programs generally, which range from .10 to .13 (Magnuson, Ruhm, & Waldfogel, 2004, p. 5). They also exceed those reported for high-quality child care programs, which seldom exceed .10 (NICHD Early Child Care Research Network & Duncan, 2003;Peisner-Feinberg et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…These effect sizes exceed those reported for other statefunded pre-K programs, which range from .23-.53 (Gilliam & Zigler, 2001), 10 and for pre-K programs generally, which range from .10 to .13 (Magnuson, Ruhm, & Waldfogel, 2004, p. 5). They also exceed those reported for high-quality child care programs, which seldom exceed .10 (NICHD Early Child Care Research Network & Duncan, 2003;Peisner-Feinberg et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…A meta-analysis of 13 state pre-K studies from 1977 to 1998 (Gilliam & Zigler, 2001) found that none used random assignment and three had no comparison groups. Of the other ten, none used adequate matching procedures and only half of them had pretest measures on the same scale as the outcome.…”
Section: Prior Studies On State Pre-kindergarten Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015). ECEC quality is also crucial for the magnitude and the long term persistence of beneficial effects (for international and US reviews see, e.g., Gilliam and Zigler 2001, Gorey 2001, Anderson et al 2003, Burger 2010, Camilli et al 2010. In the economic literature, mainly intervention studies demonstrate the beneficial effects of high quality ECEC (famous interventions include the Perry preschool program or the Abecedarian program, e.g., Heckman et al 2013, Kautz et al 2014, where children attend high ECEC quality programs as part of the intervention.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%