2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Phenomenology of Whiteness in Academic Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2015) employ critical discourse analysis and critical race theory to uncover how “racism operates on the spaces, people, and public services practices of academic libraries” (p. 249). Crist and Clark/Keefe (2022) use semi-structured interviews of academic librarians to explore tensions between librarians' racial identities and “desire for the field to improve” while confronting “the reflexive ambiguity and emotional discomfort that can accompany racial consciousness” (p. 10). Fiedler et al .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) employ critical discourse analysis and critical race theory to uncover how “racism operates on the spaces, people, and public services practices of academic libraries” (p. 249). Crist and Clark/Keefe (2022) use semi-structured interviews of academic librarians to explore tensions between librarians' racial identities and “desire for the field to improve” while confronting “the reflexive ambiguity and emotional discomfort that can accompany racial consciousness” (p. 10). Fiedler et al .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Librarian professional practice has long been enacted as an imbalanced and inequitable power dynamic between the patron ("they don't know") and the librarian ("the librarian knows it all") that perpetuates the elitist privilege code of mainstream American society (Dunbar, 2021). Chiu, Ettarh and Ferrati (2021) posit that this LIS power dynamic is an assumption birthed from the bed of white supremacy that perpetuates a fiction of neutrality and vocational awe that presents a fiction of virtuous librarianship rather than an honest and critical examination of LIS's antiquated educational paradigm that inculcates all librarians (regardless of heritage and identity) with an ethos based on the mainstream American paradigm of white supremacy (Gibson et al, 2018;Chancellor, 2019;Dunbar, 2021;Crist & Clark/Keefe, 2022;Overbey & Folk, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%