A critical reflection on analytics and artificial intelligence based analytics in hospitality and tourism management research

Abstract

Purpose This work consists of a critical reflection on the extent to which hospitality and tourism management scholars have accurately used the term “analytics” and its five types (i.e. descriptive, exploratory, predictive, prescriptive and cognitive analytics) in their research. Only cognitive analytics, the latest and most advanced type, is based on artificial intelligence (AI) and requires machine learning (ML). As cognitive analytics constitutes the cutting edge in industry application, this study aims to examine in depth the extent cognitive analytics has been covered in the literature. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a systematic literature review (SLR) of the hospitality and tourism literature on the topic of “analytics”. The SLR findings were complemented by the results of an additional search query based on “machine learning” and “deep learning” that was used as a robustness check. Moreover, the SLR findings were triangulated with recent literature reviews on related topics (e.g. big data and AI) to generate additional insights. Findings The findings of this study show that: there is a growing and accelerating body of research on analytics; the literature lacks a consistent use of terminology and definitions related to analytics. Specifically, publications rarely use scientific definitions of analytics and their different types; although AI and ML are key enabling technologies for cognitive analytics, hospitality and tourism management research did not explicitly link these terms to analytics and did not distinguish cognitive analytics from other forms of analytics that do not rely on ML. In fact, the term “cognitive analytics” is apparently missing in the hospitality and tourism management literature. Research limitations/implications This study generates a set of eight theoretical and three practical implications and advance theoretical and methodological recommendations for further research. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that explicitly and critically examines the use of analytics in general, and cognitive analytics in particular, in the hospitality and tourism management literature.

Metaverse in hospitality and tourism: a critical reflection

“…As a start, existing theories on technology adoption, eco-tourism and customer experiences can be adopted and applied into the context of metaverse as suggested in the section on future research. The effects of digitalization in the hospitality and tourism industry have received great attention from researchers such as Ozdemir et al (2023), Cheng et al (2023) and Dwivedi et al (2023a). This critical reflection contributes to the ongoing discourse on how immersive digital experiences can reshape traditional practices, customer interactions and business models.…”

Asymmetrical Influences of Service Robots’ Perceived Performance on Overall Customer Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation Leveraging Online Reviews

“…To operationalize the aforementioned measures, following an automated process, we leveraged recent progress in the literature encompassing big data analytics and eWOM (Alaei et al, 2019; Bi et al, 2019; M. Mariani & Wirtz, 2023).…”

School Leaders’ Perceptions on Barriers for Creating Inclusive Intercultural Environments and Potential Generative Ai Benefits

“…Generative AI has the ability to create content, including text, audio, images, videos, and even 3D models (Dwivedi et al, 2023). ChatGPT and Bard are two of the most popular generative AI chatbots that generate conversational discourse similar to humans (Chiu et al, 2023).…”