A critical review of Chinese and international social work: Walking a tightrope between local and global standards

Abstract

This article presents a critical analysis of the challenges global social work standards present for mainland China (hereafter China) with its authoritarian political ideology that is in tension with the profession’s universal values grounded in liberal individualism. China is caught between the Scylla of universal standards and Charybdis of indigenisation seeking to adapt social work to its unique sociocultural contexts. Based on our extensive literature review, we identified four challenges for Chinese social work: (1) balancing personal social services and social development, (2) negotiating global standards and local realities, (3) responding to poverty and other national social development issues and (4) pressures towards indigenisation, while remaining in step with social work’s global standards. China favours the continued adaptation of imported knowledge and practice interventions within local and national sociocultural, economic and political realities. This study also highlights social work in China’s urban bias and limited attention to rural issues, acknowledging this is a concern for social work even in Western contexts.

A Political Economy Analysis of Social Work’s Development in China: A Social Development Perspective

“…Essentially, social work's effectiveness was dependent on its relevance and utility in serving the state's political agenda and the respective interests of state bureaucrats and key players involved (Yan & Tsang, 2008). In addressing the sociocultural impacts of economic reform within China's authori tarian, institutional governing structures, it straddled traditional Chinese cultures and contemporary political ideologies and related discourses (Leung, 2014;Meng et al, 2022). In an authoritarian environment such as this, social work is always political, no matter what the intervention involves.…”

“…Heavily influenced by Western practice models, over the last 30 years, social work in China evolved mainly as a profession focused on individualistic solutions, mainly through case work interventions. When the Chinese Communist government recruited and deployed social workers to promote social harmony and mitigate social conflict, this approach did little to address broader regional, rural, and structural social problems, especially issues relating to migrant workers, and leftbehind women, children, and older people in rural communities (Lai, 2022;Meng, Gray, Bradt, & Roets, 2022). These social problems were a direct result of transformative modern ization that had led to rapid urbanization and the hollowing out of rural villages as rural populations moved en masse to more lucrative urban areas.…”

Strategic processes to further the professional status of social work in Nigeria

“…China followed a centralised strategy of rapid training, regulation and registration with control of the profession vested in the government Ministry of Civil Affairs (MOCA) through standardised national curricula and professional accreditation examinations, based on state-approved social work textbooks (Meng et al, 2018(Meng et al, , 2021Niu and Østbø Haugen, 2019). Its quantity-then-quality approach (Ma et al, 2015) aimed to train 1.45 million social workers by 2020 (State Council, 2016), but fell short of this goal.…”

Social work and strengthening of NGOs in development cooperation to treat drug addiction

“…The formation and development of social work as a profession was largely due to the work of international NGOs. From September 2002 to February 2004, ORA International [ 31 ] organized the first six-month course in Dushanbe to train social workers. [32,33] The courses were taught by experienced professors from universities in New Zealand, Germany and Scotland.…”