2010
DOI: 10.9741/2161-2978.1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical review of culturally responsive literacy instruction

Abstract: Eliminating the racial and ethnic achievement gap in reading and writing is a national priority. Providing literacy instruction that is both culturally responsive and evidence-based requires an understanding of culture, effective instructional practices, and how the two intersect. Although many suggestions for implementing culturally responsive reading instruction are intuitively appealing, more research evidence is needed to determine if these practices increase student engagement, motivation, and academic ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specialized coursework may come in the form of remediation, advanced, or accelerated courses. These courses have existed for some time, but high-stakes testing is also associated with teacher, principal, school, and district accountability that can result in funding losses following low student test results (Cheesman & De Pry, 2010). Teachers are less likely to recognize the abilities, strengths, and potential of Students of Color and socioeconomically disadvantaged students, partially as a result of poor high-stakes testing performance, focusing instead on issues and areas of weakness (Speirs Neumeister et al, 2007).…”
Section: Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specialized coursework may come in the form of remediation, advanced, or accelerated courses. These courses have existed for some time, but high-stakes testing is also associated with teacher, principal, school, and district accountability that can result in funding losses following low student test results (Cheesman & De Pry, 2010). Teachers are less likely to recognize the abilities, strengths, and potential of Students of Color and socioeconomically disadvantaged students, partially as a result of poor high-stakes testing performance, focusing instead on issues and areas of weakness (Speirs Neumeister et al, 2007).…”
Section: Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%