2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose a discursive approach to this study. In line with recent transitions literature, we highlight the importance of examining discourse to better understand transition dynamics that are uncertain and highly contested (Bosman, Loorbach, Frantzeskaki, & Pistorius, ; Isoaho & Karhunmaa, ). We also wish to contribute to the increasing number of studies that have already applied discursive methods to examine coal phase‐out in other places (Lehotský, Černoch, Osička, & Ocelík, ; Leipprand & Flachsland, ; Rosenbloom, ; Trencher et al, ).…”
Section: Research Design and Datasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose a discursive approach to this study. In line with recent transitions literature, we highlight the importance of examining discourse to better understand transition dynamics that are uncertain and highly contested (Bosman, Loorbach, Frantzeskaki, & Pistorius, ; Isoaho & Karhunmaa, ). We also wish to contribute to the increasing number of studies that have already applied discursive methods to examine coal phase‐out in other places (Lehotský, Černoch, Osička, & Ocelík, ; Leipprand & Flachsland, ; Rosenbloom, ; Trencher et al, ).…”
Section: Research Design and Datasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In our case, an important part of the discourse evolved around the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the various technologies with different actors seeking to legitimize (or delegitimize) their preferred options. This goes on to show that discourses of technology trajectories for public policy are continuously reproduced, negotiated, and contested in the policy arena (Isoaho & Karhunmaa, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer the second and third research questions, key information (the geographical Moher et al, 2009). foci of the articles, author affiliations, publication years, research material) was collected by reviewing and tabulating the relevant information from all the articles (for a similar approach, see, e.g., Isoaho & Karhunmaa, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geels (2014) describes, through the MLP perspective, that incumbent regimes use discourses to provide diagnosis of certain problems, prognosis through proposed solutions, or motivation by mobilizing the public to action. Discursive analysis sheds light on political orientations by pinpointing, for example, where certain energy regimes are (de)legitimized (Isoaho and Karhunmaa 2019). In their analysis of climate change discourses during the 2016 United States presidential election, Brown and Sovacool (2017, 128–129) posit that political actors “seek power and communicate policy stances to gain votes,” embedding in their statements their worldviews, frames that “represent the organisation of collective interests and normative assumptions.” Politicians rarely disclose the assumptions preceding their energy policy stances and subjective conceptualizations (Scrase and Ockwell 2010).…”
Section: Political Accents In Transition Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%