Soil restoration by exploiting the principles and basics of electrokinetic (EK) has been extended to involve several categories, such as electrokinetic remediation in soil (SEKR), soil consolidation, the prevention of soil pollution, reclaiming salt-affected soil, the dewatering/dryness of wet soils, water reuse, seed germination, sedimentation, etc. As an extension of our recently published review articles on the soil electrokinetic (SEK) process intensification/optimization, the present review illustrates the effect of a reverse-polarity mode (RPM) on the efficiency of the SEK. Based on several searches of six database search engines, we did not find any relevant reviews focused on SEK improvements using the RPM. The influences of the RPM are described by various features, including (a) pollutant removal (organic, inorganic, and mixed pollutants) and (b) integration with other processes (phyto/bioremediation and Fenton oxidation), geosynthetics (consolidation, stabilization, and sedimentation), SEK operation conditions, and soil properties. Most of the RPM studies have focused on the remediation of organic pollutants. Several benefits can be gained from applying the RPM, such as (a) controlling the soil’s temperature, pH, and moisture values at desirable levels, (b) reducing a large number of chemical additives, (c) high remediation efficiency, (d) maintaining the indigenous fungal community’s appropriate diversity and abundance, (e) a stable and higher electric current, (f) enhancing microbial growth, etc. However, the hindrances to applying the RPM are (a) reducing the electroosmosis flow, (b) relatively high energy consumption, (c) reducing the diversity of soil microbes with a prolonged experiment period, (d) providing oxygen for a microbial community that may not be desirable for anaerobic bacteria, etc. Finally, the RPM is considered an important process for improving the performance of the SEK, according to experimental endeavors.
