2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review of patient and parent caregiver oriented tools to assess health-related quality of life, activity of daily living and caregiver burden in spinal muscular atrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, a US study demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of $46,947 for chronic treatment with nusinersen and of $31,379 base case at a price of $5M for onasemnogene abeparvosec, indicating that the latter was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M [ 92 ]. Several international disease-specific registries have now been established (e.g., the International SMA Consortium Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient Registry (iSMAC), the TREAT-NMD registry and the SMArtCARE project), collecting “real-world data” on treated and untreated SMA patients with standardized outcome measures, including patient-oriented tools on a longitudinal setting [ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a US study demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of $46,947 for chronic treatment with nusinersen and of $31,379 base case at a price of $5M for onasemnogene abeparvosec, indicating that the latter was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M [ 92 ]. Several international disease-specific registries have now been established (e.g., the International SMA Consortium Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient Registry (iSMAC), the TREAT-NMD registry and the SMArtCARE project), collecting “real-world data” on treated and untreated SMA patients with standardized outcome measures, including patient-oriented tools on a longitudinal setting [ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WPAI is a six-question survey assessing the effect of a problem on an individual’s ability to work and perform regular activities with the prior 7 days. The WPAI has been validated for use in a variety of disease states and has been used in SMA clinical trials [ 28 ] but not validated in an SMA population. The assessment tool yields scores on work time missed (absenteeism), impaired productivity at work (presenteeism), overall work productivity loss (absenteeism and presenteeism combined) and impairment in non-work-related activities due to health problems (activity impairment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic assessment of patient perspectives has the capacity to provide invaluable clinical information that could otherwise be lost when relying on clinical evaluation alone [ 25 ]. Messina et al identified 36 instruments currently used in clinical trials to evaluate the impact of SMA on quality of life, activities of daily living, and caregiver burden [ 26 ]. Only ten included a combination of items exploring all these dimensions, and only six were specifically developed for SMA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is a need to supplement the current clinical outcome measures in SMA incorporating patients’ and parent caregivers’ preferences and meaningful outcomes, especially on activities of daily living domains. Regulatory agencies, scientific societies and advocacy groups have been working to improve understanding, measurement and incorporation of the perspectives and priorities of patients with SMA and their caregivers in therapy development, regulatory review processes and clinical practice [ 15 , 16 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%