1994
DOI: 10.1159/000120827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review of Personal Experiences with Craniopharyngioma: Clinical History, Surgical Technique and Operative Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical treatment with craniotomy has been the standard for many years [3,6,7,17,18,22,23]. It is particularly appropriate for suprasellar tumors and allows for visualization of the optic nerves, the optic chiasm, and the relationship of the tumor to these structures and the carotid arteries and the III rd cranial nerve.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatment with craniotomy has been the standard for many years [3,6,7,17,18,22,23]. It is particularly appropriate for suprasellar tumors and allows for visualization of the optic nerves, the optic chiasm, and the relationship of the tumor to these structures and the carotid arteries and the III rd cranial nerve.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the histology is benign and the mortality rate low, craniopharyngiomas are associated with a high rate of recurrence, which, in turn, is associated with a high rate of morbidity [1]. Although the optimal management of craniopharyngiomas remains controversial, the extent of surgical resection has been considered the most significant predictive factor of tumor cure and good functional outcome [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, the introduction of computed tomography scanning in the 1970s, followed by magnetic resonance imaging, offered "the closest thing to absolute diagnostic precision ever known for the craniopharyngiomas". 10 In combination with the introduction of microsurgical techniques, this led to significant improvements in peri-operative morbidity and mortality. 11 Radical resection was generally advocated as the treatment of choice for intrasellar and prechiasmatic tumours, with microsurgery offering "an expectation of cure, prevention of recurrence and avoidance of the side effects of radiotherapy".…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%