A Critical Review on Factors Affecting the User Adoption of Wearable and Soft Robotics

Abstract

In recent years, the advent of soft robotics has changed the landscape of wearable technologies. Soft robots are highly compliant and malleable, thus ensuring safe human-machine interactions. To date, a wide variety of actuation mechanisms have been studied and adopted into a multitude of soft wearables for use in clinical practice, such as assistive devices and rehabilitation modalities. Much research effort has been put into improving their technical performance and establishing the ideal indications for which rigid exoskeletons would play a limited role. However, despite having achieved many feats over the past decade, soft wearable technologies have not been extensively investigated from the perspective of user adoption. Most scholarly reviews of soft wearables have focused on the perspective of service providers such as developers, manufacturers, or clinicians, but few have scrutinized the factors affecting adoption and user experience. Hence, this would pose a good opportunity to gain insight into the current practice of soft robotics from a user’s perspective. This review aims to provide a broad overview of the different types of soft wearables and identify the factors that hinder the adoption of soft robotics. In this paper, a systematic literature search using terms such as “soft”, “robot”, “wearable”, and “exoskeleton” was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to include peer-reviewed publications between 2012 and 2022. The soft robotics were classified according to their actuation mechanisms into motor-driven tendon cables, pneumatics, hydraulics, shape memory alloys, and polyvinyl chloride muscles, and their pros and cons were discussed. The identified factors affecting user adoption include design, availability of materials, durability, modeling and control, artificial intelligence augmentation, standardized evaluation criteria, public perception related to perceived utility, ease of use, and aesthetics. The critical areas for improvement and future research directions to increase adoption of soft wearables have also been highlighted.

Data Hazards as an ethical toolkit for neuroscience

“…Wearable robotics designed without user input can result in products that are impractical, burdensome, or expensive to use (reviewed in (Ang et al, 2023)). Therapy approaches may lack involvement from the community it aims to help.…”

A Brief Review of Rehabilitation Wearable Robots for the Upper and Lower Limbs

“…Additionally, they described the future prospects and potential difficulties for these robots. The intrinsic mechanical components that should be taken into account during the manufacturing process and the extrinsic biological components, which include the machine-human interface, physical performance, and user compliance, were categorized and examined as the factors and barriers affecting the adoption of soft wearables [33]. Significant obstacles to wider dissemination include the high cost and complexity of implementation, as well as the limited incremental clinical benefit [34].…”

A 3D Anisotropic Thermomechanical Model for Thermally Induced Woven-Fabric-Reinforced Shape Memory Polymer Composites

“…SMPs are a class of smart materials with the advantages of high stiffness, strength, and driving force, and SMPC-based soft actuators can be easily integrated with other adaptive functional components [ 2 , 3 ]. Furthermore, their stiffness varies with heat stimuli, which makes them a point of attraction in the field of soft robotic grippers [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”