2022
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12010034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review on Optimization of Cold-Formed Steel Members for Better Structural and Thermal Performances

Abstract: The construction and building sectors are currently responsible globally for a significant share of the total energy consumption and energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. The use of Modern Methods of Construction can help reduce this, one example being the use of cold-formed steel (CFS) construction. CFS channel sections have inherent advantages, such as their high strength-to-weight ratio and excellent potential for recycling and reusing. CFS members can be rolled into different cross-sectional shapes and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(335 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, alternative materials for buildings are expected, for example, cold-formed steel (CFS), but they also must consider the sustainability aspect. CFS has been gaining popularity in the construction sector in recent years due to its superior strength-to-weight ratio, and ease of formability, when compared to hot-rolled steel (HRS) [14][15][16][17][18][19]. CFS members can be rolled into different cross-sectional shapes and optimizing these shapes can further improve their load-bearing capacities, resulting in a more economical and efficient building solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, alternative materials for buildings are expected, for example, cold-formed steel (CFS), but they also must consider the sustainability aspect. CFS has been gaining popularity in the construction sector in recent years due to its superior strength-to-weight ratio, and ease of formability, when compared to hot-rolled steel (HRS) [14][15][16][17][18][19]. CFS members can be rolled into different cross-sectional shapes and optimizing these shapes can further improve their load-bearing capacities, resulting in a more economical and efficient building solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel has a near 100% recycle rate, and it has never been downcycled in the same manner that other building materials have been [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. For example, when the wood is chopped, the fibres shorten, whereas recycling steel keeps all of its qualities on a molecular level, offering greater robustness [49]. Steel constructions also require less maintenance because they are not affected by moisture or biological activity [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies analysed the strength of this material [23][24][25][26][27][28] and its ability under certain conditions (e.g., high temperature) [29][30][31][32][33], as well as proposed the design rules and assessment method of the steel product [34][35][36][37][38][39]. However, despite its good performance and the large market for steel materials in the country, the environmental impact of the steel industry cannot be negligible and needs to be considered [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%