2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review on the interaction of substrate nutrient balance and microbial community structure and function in anaerobic co-digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the others, these were assigned to six phyla and others, which were Chloroflexi (2.6%), Proteobacteria (1.8%), Tenericutes (1.7%), Bacteroidetes (1.5%), Spirochaetes (1.5%), and Synergistetes (1.0%). Identical to previous studies, we found that Firmicutes and Chloroflexi were able to degrade a large number of organic compounds under a variety of conditions and had been found in a wide range of co-digestion [26]. Illumina MiSeq results indicated that the uppermost bacteria were all affiliated to the phylum Firmicutes in the five reactors and in the control fed with different proportions of substrates.…”
Section: Performance Of Bacterial Communitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the others, these were assigned to six phyla and others, which were Chloroflexi (2.6%), Proteobacteria (1.8%), Tenericutes (1.7%), Bacteroidetes (1.5%), Spirochaetes (1.5%), and Synergistetes (1.0%). Identical to previous studies, we found that Firmicutes and Chloroflexi were able to degrade a large number of organic compounds under a variety of conditions and had been found in a wide range of co-digestion [26]. Illumina MiSeq results indicated that the uppermost bacteria were all affiliated to the phylum Firmicutes in the five reactors and in the control fed with different proportions of substrates.…”
Section: Performance Of Bacterial Communitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The average relative abundances of Firmicutes for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 reactors were 90.7%, 94.2%, 96.5%, 89.2%, and 92.5%, respectively ( Figure 4). This indicated that five reactors in this study may have achieved better digestion performance due to the predominance of Firmicutes and greater bacterial diversity [26]. For the others, these were assigned to six phyla and others, which were Chloroflexi (2.6%), Proteobacteria (1.8%), Tenericutes (1.7%), Bacteroidetes (1.5%), Spirochaetes (1.5%), and Synergistetes (1.0%).…”
Section: Performance Of Bacterial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Co-digestion offers various advantages like improved system stability, adjusted C/N ratio, a better nutrient balance, dilution of toxic compounds, improved buffer capacity, increased biodegradation, adjusted moisture content, a supply of TEs, and increasing OLR. It can therefore, enhance volumetric biogas recovery [61][62][63] and improves the fertilizer value of the digestate [64]. These advantages of co-digestion are presented in Figure 6.…”
Section: Co-digestion Of Rsmentioning
confidence: 99%