2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review on the thermal performance of alternating cross-section tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research was considered to be a basis for further study of cross-sectional area change. Likewise, Rukruang et al [34] analyzed the thermal performance of tubes with alternating cross sections, indicating that tubes with alternating cross sections have improved vorticity, improving the tube's thermal performance. In addition, Mimi-Elsaid et al [35] indicate that using a circular cross section of a helical tube has a higher heat transfer-per-unit pumping power that is higher than that of the elliptical cross section of a helical tube and the square cross section of a helical tube by approximately 23.08% and 84.61%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research was considered to be a basis for further study of cross-sectional area change. Likewise, Rukruang et al [34] analyzed the thermal performance of tubes with alternating cross sections, indicating that tubes with alternating cross sections have improved vorticity, improving the tube's thermal performance. In addition, Mimi-Elsaid et al [35] indicate that using a circular cross section of a helical tube has a higher heat transfer-per-unit pumping power that is higher than that of the elliptical cross section of a helical tube and the square cross section of a helical tube by approximately 23.08% and 84.61%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that an alternating cross-section tube produced secondary flow and turbulence intensity through the tube curvature. Multi-longitudinal vortices formed along the length of the tube, which produced a significant enhancement in the heat transfer performance of the tube [28]. Furthermore, their study investigated the air-side performance of ACF tube heat exchangers with three hydraulic diameters of 4.16, 4.75, and 5.20 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%