2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical review on the mechanisms of persulfate activation by iron-based materials: Clarifying some ambiguity and controversies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…nFe 3 O 4 showed a higher catalytic activity on PS activation for BTEX degradation than commercial Fe 3 O 4 (Figure 3a). The main reason was that this heterogeneous catalytic process had a crucial weakness, that is, the corrosion products (Hou et al, 2021). The reaction intermediates and the over‐oxidation products on the surface of Fe 3 O 4 inhibited the further activation to PS (Hung et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nFe 3 O 4 showed a higher catalytic activity on PS activation for BTEX degradation than commercial Fe 3 O 4 (Figure 3a). The main reason was that this heterogeneous catalytic process had a crucial weakness, that is, the corrosion products (Hou et al, 2021). The reaction intermediates and the over‐oxidation products on the surface of Fe 3 O 4 inhibited the further activation to PS (Hung et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational Methodology. DFT calculations were performed using the DMol 3 (version 2018). The generalized gradient approximation of the Perdew−Wang (PW91) functional was employed for exchange−correlation potential.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (PDS-AOPs) have been generally acknowledged as an effective method for pollutant degradation in water purification. , Among the numerous approaches for PDS activation to produce highly oxidative species (e.g., radicals, high-valent metal ions, and singlet oxygen), transition-metal-based activation was the most viable one owing to its low energy requirement, operational convenience, and high effectiveness. Heterogeneous transition-metal oxides (M x O y ) have the advantages of low metal ion leaching and easy postreaction recovery as compared to the homogeneous metal ions (e.g., Fe 2+ and Cu 2+ ions), which showed potential applications for contaminant degradation in real water. However, lower PDS-activation efficiency of M x O y compared to the homogeneous analogues remains challenging, and the limited understanding of the PDS activation mechanism at the molecular level poses a huge obstacle to the rational design of highly efficient M x O y catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External energy activation is an efficient method; however, its high energy consumption and strict reaction conditions have hampered its large-scale application. , Transition-metal activation is a simple and efficient technique that does not require extra energy; the process mainly exhibits changes in the valence, chemistry states, and unoccupied orbits of the catalysts, which are accountable for electron transfer during the activation of PS with the production of active radicals. , However, a main disadvantage to using metal activation is the potential for secondary contamination due to the leaching of toxic metal. In addition, the change in the valence state of the oxidation–reduction center necessarily alters the chemical properties of the relevant metals, including the number of coordination sites, the geometry, and the crystal structure .…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%