2004
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2004.10805043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Review on The Administrative Reforms in The Korean Central Government: A Case Study of The Kim Dae-Jung Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the government was criticized for high levels of inefficiency and rigidity, as well as a complete lack of transparency. On the eve of the reforms in 1998, Korea ranked below the Philippines, Mexico, and Brazil in terms of overall country-level competitiveness rankings according to the International Institute for Management Development's (IMD) influential index, while government administration in particular ranked a dismal 42 out of 48 countries (Lee 2004).…”
Section: Context and Goals Of Korea's Results-based Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the government was criticized for high levels of inefficiency and rigidity, as well as a complete lack of transparency. On the eve of the reforms in 1998, Korea ranked below the Philippines, Mexico, and Brazil in terms of overall country-level competitiveness rankings according to the International Institute for Management Development's (IMD) influential index, while government administration in particular ranked a dismal 42 out of 48 countries (Lee 2004).…”
Section: Context and Goals Of Korea's Results-based Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early studies outlined wider-ranging, more general trends in policy coordination, recent studies have focused on specific coordination mechanisms and instruments (Park et al, 1998;Lee, 2003;Kim & Jung, 2011;Kim, Yu, Song, & Park, 2014), the most common and of which is "organizational restructuring" (Kim et al, 2014;Kim & Jung, 2011). When policy conflicts between central departments persist, the departments are merged to allow the senior manager of the organization to resolve policy problems through internal coordination.…”
Section: Mechanisms Strategy and Instruments For Coordination In Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies documenting formal coordination mechanisms and instruments have also been on the uprise (Lee, 2003;Yu & Ha, 2010;Kwon, 2016). In a 2003 study, Lee analyzed the use of cabinet councils as a coordination mechanism during the Kim Dae-jung administration, demonstrating that they contributed to the coordination to an extent but were not firmly institutionalized at the time.…”
Section: Mechanisms Strategy and Instruments For Coordination In Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation