2005
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200425674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical role for lipophosphoglycan in proinflammatory responses of dendritic cells to Leishmania mexicana

Abstract: Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) influences the response of dendritic cells (DC) and therefore development of innate and adaptive immunity. Different forms of Leishmania mexicana have distinct effects on DC, with promastigotes and amastigotes being activating and apparently neutral, respectively. We investigated whether stage-specific differences in surface composition might account for these distinct effects. Amastigotes and promastigotes lacking the lpg1 gene needed for lipophosph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), suggesting that promastigotes of L. major do not contain component leading to complete DC maturation like TLR ligands. This is in agreement with a report showing that, with regard to DC activation, infection with L. major is a silent process (34). Thus, the absence of IL-12 secretion by TNF-DCs pulsed with L. major lysate might support the development of a non-protective Th2 response ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), suggesting that promastigotes of L. major do not contain component leading to complete DC maturation like TLR ligands. This is in agreement with a report showing that, with regard to DC activation, infection with L. major is a silent process (34). Thus, the absence of IL-12 secretion by TNF-DCs pulsed with L. major lysate might support the development of a non-protective Th2 response ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1) and CD1d expression (Fig. 4D), which is in agreement with another previous report (34). These controversial results might be explained by the different DCs (BM-derived mouse DCs vs monocyte-derived human DCs), different Leishmania species (L. major causing cutaneous leishmaniasis vs L. infantum causing visceral leishmaniasis), and different types of Ag loading (pulsing with Leishmania lysate vs infection with live parasites) used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Studies in mice that exhibit LC deficiencies have changed this paradigm. Recent studies indicate that LC do not function as essential antigen-presenting cells in contact hypersensitivity reactions (10)(11)(12) or antiviral responses (13,14). Based on studies of contact hypersensitity (11,15) and cutaneous leishmaniasis (16), an immune-attenuating role for LC has been suggested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment we used full maturation, TLR-dependent and -independent microbial stimuli and full-maturation, nonmicrobial stimuli. The TLR-dependent microbial stimuli used were: LPS (TLR4), CpG (TLR9), Pam3Cys (TLR2) (26), BCG, and L. mexicana promastigote (27,28). The TLR-independent microbial stimuli were CT and PT.…”
Section: Only Dcs Activated With Tlr-dependent Microbial Stimuli Are mentioning
confidence: 99%