2019
DOI: 10.29086/2519-5476/2019/v26n2a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critical Self-reflection on Theorising Education Development as ‘Epistemological Access’ to ‘Powerful Knowledge’

Abstract: This paper is a critical self-reflective piece located in the context of South African Higher education post the student protests of 2015-2017. The paper is motivated by the insight that 'epistemic decolonisation' involves exposing 'the hidden complicity between the rhetoric of modernity and the logic of coloniality' (Mignolo 2010: 313). My argument is located in the contradiction between modernity and coloniality which I suggest structurally conditions the experience of black students in Education Development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are interested in being/knowing and how these intersect on the course and ultimately contribute to students reconfiguring knowledges. Our conceptualisation of epistemic access resonates with the work of Luckett (2019) who argues for the importance of broadening "the concept of 'epistemological access' to include sociocultural and ontological access and taking into account the effects of our own positionality and institutional roles" (Luckett 2019, 55). We are interested in giving students access to multiple knowledges and opportunities for reconfiguring knowledge.…”
Section: A Critical Dialogic Approach and Epistemic Accessmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We are interested in being/knowing and how these intersect on the course and ultimately contribute to students reconfiguring knowledges. Our conceptualisation of epistemic access resonates with the work of Luckett (2019) who argues for the importance of broadening "the concept of 'epistemological access' to include sociocultural and ontological access and taking into account the effects of our own positionality and institutional roles" (Luckett 2019, 55). We are interested in giving students access to multiple knowledges and opportunities for reconfiguring knowledge.…”
Section: A Critical Dialogic Approach and Epistemic Accessmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The #FeesMustFall protests and associated movements urged us to recognise that many approaches to transformation, including the formation of ECPs, have done little to acknowledge the legacies that colonial modes of thinking have had, and continue to have, on the everyday lived experiences of students in spaces that still feel alienating to them. Similarly, Luckett's (2019) postcolonial critique of ECPs highlights that, despite best efforts aimed at diversity and inclusivity, these programmes not only segregate students into separate, remedial spaces, but result in the discursive construction of ECP students in a way that is in opposition to "the norm" (or "the mainstream") and through deficit discourses and in deficit terms such as "disadvantaged" or "underprepared". When viewed through a postcolonial lens, ECPs can also be likened to the type of education endeavour offered by the colonial powers who sought to civilise "the natives" in order to make them fit for modernity (Luckett, 2019, p. 41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I, myself, have made this mistake (see Bernard, 2015). However, the recent #FeesMustFall protests highlighted that many approaches to transformation have been superficial at best, and extremely problematic at worst (Luckett & Naicker, 2019;Luckett, 2019). This is because they have done little to acknowledge the legacies that colonial modes of thinking have had, and continue to have, on the everyday lived experiences of students in spaces that still feel alienating to them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the passage above, Torres uses a quote by Freire (2005, p. 137) stating that violence emerges from the oppressor rather than those who they oppress (likely rooted initially in Freire's reading of Fanon's (1963) Wretched of the Earth which inspired him to revise Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Horton et al, 1990)). In the same handbook Michael Apple (2019) argues through Gramsci et al (1971) the need of powerful, elite knowledge to be not thrown out but rather reconstructed (or reinvented in Freirean terms) for necessary 'role[s] of "organic" and "public" intellectuals,' while also acknowledging epistemological justice complexities and concerns with such work (could be exemplified by current passionate debates in South Africa on social realism within education (see Luckett, 2019)).…”
Section: Greg William Misiaszekmentioning
confidence: 99%