2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical test of the classical rate theory for void swelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Consistent with the work of Okita on the effect of displacement rate [16], the effect of bulk nickel on swelling occurs in the void density and not the void size. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3. Consistent with the work of Okita on the effect of displacement rate [16], the effect of bulk nickel on swelling occurs in the void density and not the void size. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Because a difference in bias for point defects between dislocations and cavities is required for swelling to occur, segregation may alter the net bias and thus alter the swelling. Since measurements have shown that swelling in austenitic stainless steels ultimately reaches a terminal rate of 1%/dpa, any effect of segregation on swelling during void growth is likely to occur during the transient phase of void swelling, consistent with the work of Okita [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can determine its value by inserting equation (15) into equation (13) and integrating it. The result is…”
Section: A General Definition Of the Bias Factor For Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It now demands a larger empirical bias on the order of 0.1 to 0.2 to explain the void swelling rate of 1%/dpa measured in austenitic stainless steels, and this larger bias agrees now much better with the theoretically derived values. Indeed, a careful analysis of void swelling data [13] obtained for pure ternary austenitic steels, lacking any precipitates and impurities, and comparing the data with theoretical predictions of void swelling implies bias values between 0.25 and 0.40 for network dislocations and between 0.40 and 0.55 for prismatic dislocation loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%