1998
DOI: 10.1038/25665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses

Abstract: In the developing frog visual system, topographic refinement of the retinotectal projection depends on electrical activity. In vivo whole-cell recording from developing Xenopus tectal neurons shows that convergent retinotectal synapses undergo activity-dependent cooperation and competition following correlated pre- and postsynaptic spiking within a narrow time window. Synaptic inputs activated repetitively within 20 ms before spiking of the tectal neuron become potentiated, whereas subthreshold inputs activate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
700
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 790 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
43
700
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This finding is robust and has been found in neurons from the hippocampus using acute, (23) organotypic slices, (31) or dissociated cell culture, (32) and in layers V (33,34) and II/III (35) of the cerebral cortex, as well as in vivo preparations using cat (36,37) and Xenopus (38) visual systems. The temporal window permissive for LTP induction is 10-20 ms (milliseconds) whereas the window in which the presynaptic spike can follow the postsynaptic spike in order to induce LTD ranges from 20 to 100 ms in different preparations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). This finding is robust and has been found in neurons from the hippocampus using acute, (23) organotypic slices, (31) or dissociated cell culture, (32) and in layers V (33,34) and II/III (35) of the cerebral cortex, as well as in vivo preparations using cat (36,37) and Xenopus (38) visual systems. The temporal window permissive for LTP induction is 10-20 ms (milliseconds) whereas the window in which the presynaptic spike can follow the postsynaptic spike in order to induce LTD ranges from 20 to 100 ms in different preparations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although Emptage and colleagues report that NMDAR-mediated release of Ca 2þ from stores underlies most of the Ca 2þ signal following single, subthreshold EPSPs, (83) this result has not been reproduced. (38,43,84) Moreover, our simulations, which quantitatively match Ca 2þ signaling profiles following an action potential, are able to account fully for the magnitude of the fluorescent Ca 2þ signal during an EPSP using conservative estimates of NMDAR numbers and single-channel Ca 2þ conductances, therefore suggesting that direct Ca 2þ influx through NMDARs is sufficient to account for the observed increase in intracellular Ca 2þ .…”
Section: Epsp-induced Ca 2þ Influxmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Recent experiments demonstrating that input timing on the order of milliseconds can be the difference between synaptic strengthening and weakening provides a potential mechanism that would allow sensory statistics to precisely control the connectivity and temporal dynamics of large networks of neurons (Bi and Poo, 1999;Feldman, 2000;Froemke and Dan, 2002;Schuett et al, 2001;Song and Abbott, 2001;Song et al, 2000;Yao and Dan, 2001;Zhang et al, 1998). Network models that incorporate this form of Hebbian learning, called spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP), are highly sensitive to changes in input correlation (Song and Abbott, 2001).…”
Section: Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to learn the behavioral sequence rapidly via NMDA-dependent synaptic plasticity these neurons should be activated in the same temporal order within ,10 ms. We presented a computational mechanism that could accomplish this task, made several predictions using this mechanism, and verified these predictions experimentally using data from hippocampal place cells [1]. In an accompanying article, Melamed et al have raised several interesting open questions raised by our work [2]. Here, we point to potential solutions for three of these questions.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%