2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique and systematic review of the clinical utility of hepatitis B core-related antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these data, HBcrAg is not completely equivalent to HBV DNA for the management of patients during and off NA therapy. Our findings are in line with a recently published meta-analysis focusing on the clinical utility of HBcrAg in chronic HBV infection [ 24 ]. In their analyses, Adraneda et al calculated a false positive and negative rate for the assay of 9% and 12–35%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these data, HBcrAg is not completely equivalent to HBV DNA for the management of patients during and off NA therapy. Our findings are in line with a recently published meta-analysis focusing on the clinical utility of HBcrAg in chronic HBV infection [ 24 ]. In their analyses, Adraneda et al calculated a false positive and negative rate for the assay of 9% and 12–35%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The limitations of measuring HBcrAg have been discussed previously [ 24 ], and we have shown that quantification of HBcrAg during treatment is limited for the evaluation of treatment efficacy as well as for the detection of virologic relapse after NA discontinuation. Nevertheless, the clinical utility for determining treatment indication in the absence of quantitative HBV DNA has been demonstrated [ 19 ], which is a particularly important role in countries with limited access to healthcare resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples with HBcrAg above 7 log U/mL are diluted and retested to detect the quantitative level of HBcrAg [ 42 ]. Notably, the relative contribution of each HBcrAg component in current commercial kit testing is unknown and may be influenced by factors such as viral genotype and HBeAg status, which may affect the accuracy and significance of HBcrAg as a biomarker [ 43 ]. Studies have shown that HBeAg is the main component of HBcrAg in HBeAg-positive patients (71.98 ± 10.24%), while HBcAg and p22cr only account for 17.64 ± 8.84% and 15.80 ± 9.13% of HBcrAg, respectively [ 44 ].…”
Section: Serum Hbcrag Can Reflect the Transcription Level Of Intrahep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional clinical significance of the HBcrAg assay in CHB is not yet fully understood [83]. Also, as the false-positive rate in CHB is 9.3% and the false-negative rate is 12-35%, caution is considered necessary in interpreting the results [89].…”
Section: Hbcrag and Antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%