2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2005.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique of finite Hilbert basis set calculations for the angular distribution of ionized electrons produced in p+H impact at 20keV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excellent agreement using CTMC acts as a decisive test to calculate other differential cross sections, such as angular distributions of ionized electrons, or electron energy distributions. [17]; quantum calculations, black curves [17,18]; red full curve, CTMC calculations [17]…”
Section: Scattering Angular Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The excellent agreement using CTMC acts as a decisive test to calculate other differential cross sections, such as angular distributions of ionized electrons, or electron energy distributions. [17]; quantum calculations, black curves [17,18]; red full curve, CTMC calculations [17]…”
Section: Scattering Angular Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.13 are plotted experimental differential cross sections (full squares) dσ I /d e , with d e = 2π sinθ e dθ e , where θ e is the detection angle of the emitted target electron after ionization, for a projectile energy of 20 keV [17]. They are compared to a large variety of theoretical calculations, including quantum models (black curves) [17,18] and CTMC model (red curve). No quantum theory is able to reproduce the experimental data, especially at large detection angles.…”
Section: Angular Distributions Of Ionized Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these problems, at 20 keV proton energy, it has been established that a two center FHBS expansion is necessary to describe the electron ejected from a hydrogen target (Reading et al, 2004). The usual FHBS approach treats electrons transferred to the projectile as distinguishable from electrons left near the target; the two distinctly centered bases have vanishing overlap as the two protons separate.…”
Section: Differential Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these methods do not clearly treat quantal interference effects which are perhaps important in the 20 keV proton energy range (Reading et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%