1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3794(96)00059-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique of Lijphart's “electoral systems and party systems”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is that much of the recent theoretical literature on voter and elite coordination in party systems focuses on the district magnitude rather than the electoral threshold (Cox, 1997(Cox, , 1999. Second, it is not clear that the method for constructing effective thresholds is theoretically justified (Penadés, 1997). This is partly due to the problems associated with capturing the effect of district magnitudes and compensatory/ additional seats in a single number.…”
Section: The Instrumental Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that much of the recent theoretical literature on voter and elite coordination in party systems focuses on the district magnitude rather than the electoral threshold (Cox, 1997(Cox, , 1999. Second, it is not clear that the method for constructing effective thresholds is theoretically justified (Penadés, 1997). This is partly due to the problems associated with capturing the effect of district magnitudes and compensatory/ additional seats in a single number.…”
Section: The Instrumental Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average district magnitude is calculated by simply dividing the total number of seats in the legislature by the number of districts. For details on the discussion surrounding the calculation of effective thresholds see Lijphart, 1994Lijphart, : 26-30, 1997Penades, 1997;Taagepera, 1998. Strictly speaking, when inferred from the average district magnitude, the effective threshold of an electoral system is not a specific percentage of the vote but is a range of possibilities between the upper threshold and the lower threshold.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%