2002
DOI: 10.5840/philafricana20025114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique of Oruka’s Philosophic Sagacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not within the purview of this paper to render an elaborate critique of Oruka. Scholars like Kalumba (2002) and Ochieng (2008) have done so. For our purposes, it suffices to point out that “sage philosophy” still does not address the problem of collective worldview raised by Hountondji.…”
Section: Ethnophilosophy and Its Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not within the purview of this paper to render an elaborate critique of Oruka. Scholars like Kalumba (2002) and Ochieng (2008) have done so. For our purposes, it suffices to point out that “sage philosophy” still does not address the problem of collective worldview raised by Hountondji.…”
Section: Ethnophilosophy and Its Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, "Time is distinct from and independent of the events that occur within it. 25 Gyekye advances that through the principle which confers upon the humans their destiny, time is independent of events. The destined identity, time is an influence on personality.…”
Section: African and The Idea Of Future Timementioning
confidence: 99%