1982
DOI: 10.1159/000225646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique of the Practice of Plotting Data Obtained in vivo on an ‘Hours after Treatment’ Format

Abstract: The erroneous and misleading conclusions that result when data obtained in vivo are plotted on an ‘hours after treatment’ format when compared to a ‘time of day’ or ‘time of circadian period’ format are illustrated. The mitotic index of the corneal epithelium and the amount of DNA synthetic activity in the tip of the tongue are the examples used. Animals were kept on a light-dark cycle with light from 06.00 to 18.00 CST. Treatment with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 ml of saline at 05.00 compared to treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If circadian time significantly affected the response of the EAC the 2 lines in figure 9 should be very dissimilar when plotted on this format [7]. Since the data are very similar this illustrates that the EAC has a response to HU which is not altered by the circadian time of treatment with HU.…”
Section: -L 4 -I-------------------1-----------------------1-------mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If circadian time significantly affected the response of the EAC the 2 lines in figure 9 should be very dissimilar when plotted on this format [7]. Since the data are very similar this illustrates that the EAC has a response to HU which is not altered by the circadian time of treatment with HU.…”
Section: -L 4 -I-------------------1-----------------------1-------mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Once this has happened the rhythms in all variables (e.g. DNA-SA) in each animal are entrained to the light-dark cycle and therefore the colony rhythm is identical to each individual rhythm and vice versa [7], ' The mice were housed 5 to a cage with 5 cages per chronobiology chamber. A detailed description of these chambers and the animal care practices operative in this laboratory has been publish ed [5], 2 3 days prior to the start of an experiment body weights were obtained at 15.00 h. Almost all of the mice weighed between 29 and 31 g. Mice not weighing from 29 to 31 g were omitted from the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were purchased at 6 weeks of age and kept on a 12:12 light/dark cycle (light from 0600 to 1800 CST) for 14 days prior to and throughout each experiment. The light/dark cycle does not cause circadian rhythms' to occur, it simply serves to synchronize each innate, endogenous circadian rhythm in each individual to a fixed environmental cue (Burns, 1982). In this situation the data obtained from a group of research animals are equivalent to single animal data and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Burns ER. 1982. A critique of the practice of plotting data obtained in vivo on an 'hours after treatment' format.…”
Section: Plotting Data On An “Hours After Treatment” Format Vs a “Timmentioning
confidence: 99%