2016
DOI: 10.1108/jiabr-04-2016-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critique on accounting for murabaha contract

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the accounting treatment and reporting of a murabaha contract and its implication to the financial statements of Islamic banks. In addition, the paper also explains the implication of time value of money on the measurement of a murabaha contract and the concept of substance over form in recognising financial transactions. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews the accounting treatment and reporting for a murabaha contract as stated in the Financial Acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, in essence, the "interest" rate method from conventional financing; however, scholars such as Muhamat et al (2011) convey that Islamic banks use terminology that appeals to customers to gain a competitive advantage. Using the effective profit rate method is a departure from the previous accounting standard for Murabaha, which required profit to be allocated on a straight-line basis (Ahmed et al 2016). This means that both AAOIFI and IFRS use the amortized cost method to account for the Murabaha contract, resulting in higher cashflows at the beginning of the contract, which subsequently reduces over the period of the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is, in essence, the "interest" rate method from conventional financing; however, scholars such as Muhamat et al (2011) convey that Islamic banks use terminology that appeals to customers to gain a competitive advantage. Using the effective profit rate method is a departure from the previous accounting standard for Murabaha, which required profit to be allocated on a straight-line basis (Ahmed et al 2016). This means that both AAOIFI and IFRS use the amortized cost method to account for the Murabaha contract, resulting in higher cashflows at the beginning of the contract, which subsequently reduces over the period of the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies, however, focus on FAS 2: Murabaha and Murabaha to the Purchase Order which FAS28 has subsequently replaced: Murabaha and Other Deferred Payment Sales. The study by Ahmed et al (2016), sought to compare the AAOIFI and IFRS accounting standards when accounting for a Murabaha contract. The authors conclude that FAS 2, developed by AAOIFI, considers the Sharia requirements contained within the Murabaha contract and requires profit distribution on a straight-line basis.…”
Section: Related Studies On Accounting For the Murabaha Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IFRS and its compatibility with the Islamic financial institutions has been explored by many scholars (Ahmed et al , 2016; Albarrak and El-Halaby, 2019; Shafii and Abdul Rahman, 2016; Sharairi, 2020). AAOIFI governance disclosure and IFRS comparison is provided by Albarrak and El-Halaby (2019); critical analysis of AAOIFI and IFRS for Murabaha contract is discussed by Ahmed et al (2016); factors affecting the adoption of IFRS standards by the Islamic banks and unique characteristics of Islamic banks that prohibits Islamic banks to adopt IFRS standards are explored by Sharairi (2020). Moreover, the specific issues such as fair value measurement for Islamic financial instruments related to IFRS and IFIs have been investigated by Shafii and Abdul Rahman (2016) and Gharbi (2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the issue of the relevance of conventional accounting standards such as IFRS15 "revenue from contracts with customers" to account for this transaction. According to Ahmed et al (2016), IFRS requires that Murabaha contract is recognized as a financing instrument and the measurement is based on amortized costs, which apply the concept of the time value of money. This would amount to treating the credit facility as a loan and the mark-up as interest on this loan, which is not acceptable from the Islamic view.…”
Section: B Murabaha Financingmentioning
confidence: 99%