2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85347-1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Critique on the Use of Machine Learning on Public Datasets for Intrusion Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding public datasets, a critical problem was documented by Catillo et al [240]. Despite the rapid growth in the number of articles in this area, many follow a common pattern: propose intrusion detection systems, conduct tests with public datasets, and obtain exceptional detection performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding public datasets, a critical problem was documented by Catillo et al [240]. Despite the rapid growth in the number of articles in this area, many follow a common pattern: propose intrusion detection systems, conduct tests with public datasets, and obtain exceptional detection performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is advisable to complement evaluations with additional real-world data and remain cautious of potential biases or limitations inherent to any dataset [56]. The CICIDS 2017 dataset, along with other datasets and methodologies, contributes to advancing the development of robust and effective intrusion detection techniques to protect network infrastructures from emerging cyber threats [57].…”
Section: Cicids 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%