2017
DOI: 10.7595/management.fon.2017.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CRM Performance Measurement in Banking Using Integrated BSC and Customized ANP-BOCR Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative relationship was reported between competitive pressure and continuous digital disruption (Bughin and Zeebroeck, 2017). Previous findings also showed a positive insignificant impact between User expectation and continuous digital disruption (Orsatti and Riemer, 2015;Tornjanski et al, 2017, Aly, 2020. The research findings of (Hoong et al, 2017;Elkaseh et al, 2016) indicated an insignificant impact between advancement of technology and continuous digital disruption.…”
Section: Discussion On Findingsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A negative relationship was reported between competitive pressure and continuous digital disruption (Bughin and Zeebroeck, 2017). Previous findings also showed a positive insignificant impact between User expectation and continuous digital disruption (Orsatti and Riemer, 2015;Tornjanski et al, 2017, Aly, 2020. The research findings of (Hoong et al, 2017;Elkaseh et al, 2016) indicated an insignificant impact between advancement of technology and continuous digital disruption.…”
Section: Discussion On Findingsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This research findings, agree with the research findings of Orsatti and Riemer (2015), whose research findings found that digital disruption often feels sudden yet the source of dis-ruption has often been present and even observed for a while before it creates a significant impact because customers' expectations grow with time. Similarly, the research findings of Tornjanski et al (2017) suggest potential difficulties in implementing new types of banking business models that the digital age places on banks for a large number of consumers of banking services because of user preferences. Also, their study reveals that the main reasons why customers in Serbia do not favour the use of internet-based technologies are that it further facilitates the implementation of new strategies and measures to find effective solutions for both parties.…”
Section: Discussion On Findingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the authors, sustainable development is grounded in the collective axiological objectives with an ambidexter perspective that implies orientation on both, short-term results and long-term effects, while creating sustainable value implies satisfying the needs of stakeholders beyond "classical" customers, by shifting focus from "customer centricity" to "internal and external stakeholders centricity" (Morioka et al, 2016). The brightness of this thought represents a breath of a concept of open innovations which jointly with the lightness of an ambidextrous organization underlies a sustainable development by incorporating a holistic (digital) business ecosystem in the process of creating value for all involved parties (Chesbrough, 2003;Fasnacht, 2021;Fasnacht, 2009;Tornjanski et al, 2020c;Tornjanski et al, 2021c;Tornjanski et al, 2021a;Tornjanski et al, 2015;Tornjanski et al, 2014). Society 5.0 represents the fruitful concept, bright vision and growth strategy of a sustainable future with the eye of a "supersmart society" designed for the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The super-smart society aims to boost and empower a sustainable society by integrating innovations developed in Industry 4.0 into humans' everyday life, organizations, businesses and nations. The purpose of the super-smart society is to create purposeful, smart, comfortable and sustainable lives for the long-term prosperity and well-being of all (Ferreira & Serpa, 2018;Fukuyama, 2018;Japan Government, 2020;Keidanren, 2016;Tornjanski et al, 2020c;Tornjanski et al, 2020a;European Commission, 2021;Tornjanski et al, 2021c;Tornjanski et al, 2021a;Tornjanski & Čudanov, 2021b). To effectively transform businesses, economies and societies towards the vision of a supersmart society, project management sustainability viewed in the context of Society 5.0 should be taken into account as a powerful contributor capable of efficiently supporting and effectively achieving the desired outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%