2013
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Country Study of the Relationship between Weberian Bureaucracy and Government Performance

Abstract: This paper challenges the long-term criticism of the efficiency of the Weberian model of bureaucracy, on the hypothesis that its performance or competitiveness might be context specific, as what works best in some bureaucratic settings is unlikely to work to the same degree in others. To perform this assessment, this study analyzes relationships between characteristics of the Weberian model of bureaucracy and government performance in nations possessing different levels of democratic development.The key findin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second 'meso' level of government concerns particular organizations and institutions associated with the delivery of specific public services, such as police or the Internal Revenue Service. Hence, trust in these two levels of government may be more sensitive to performance with respect to public service provision [28,29], vary across policy area and institutions, and as such constitute more of a specific percpetion of government [20,30].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework 21 Trust In Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second 'meso' level of government concerns particular organizations and institutions associated with the delivery of specific public services, such as police or the Internal Revenue Service. Hence, trust in these two levels of government may be more sensitive to performance with respect to public service provision [28,29], vary across policy area and institutions, and as such constitute more of a specific percpetion of government [20,30].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework 21 Trust In Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the COCOPS survey, see, for example, Andrews (2017), Andrews, Beynon, and Aoife (2019), Bezes and Jeannot (2018), Hammerschmid, Van de Walle, and Stimac (2013), Hammerschmid et al (2016), Ongaro, Ferré, and Fattore (2015), Raudla et al (2015), Raudla et al (2017), Van der Voet and Steven (2015). For the QoG Expert Survey, see Boräng, Nistotskaya, andXezonakis (2017), Charron, Dahlström, and, Cho et al (2013), Cornell (2014, Cornell and Grimes (2015), Lapuente (2017), Fernández-Carro andLapuente-Giné (2016), Gustavson and Aksel (2016), Kopecký et al (2016), Nistotskaya and Cingolani (2016), Sundell (2014), Schuster (2016), Suzuki and Demircioglu (2018), Van de Walle et al (2016), Versteeg and Ginsburg (2017), Van de Walle, Steijn, and Jilke (2015). 5.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, the selection process of employees and leaders in government becomes an absolute thing done in order to get professional human resources and can show high performance. Cho, et. al.…”
Section: Literature Review Related With Meritocracy and Merit Principlementioning
confidence: 99%