2014
DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2013.811430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Organizational Dissent and Workplace Freedom in Five European Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Argumentativeness and dissent were not positively correlated, and tenure did not relate to dissent. Croucher et al (2014) also surveyed individuals in Finland, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, to confirm the relationship between dissent and workplace freedom of speech (WPFS) and to explore differences in dissent and WPFS between the nations. Results revealed WPFS is not positively correlated with dissent because employment legislation and economic pressures on organizations influence dissent.…”
Section: Cultural Differences In Expressing Organizational Dissentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Argumentativeness and dissent were not positively correlated, and tenure did not relate to dissent. Croucher et al (2014) also surveyed individuals in Finland, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, to confirm the relationship between dissent and workplace freedom of speech (WPFS) and to explore differences in dissent and WPFS between the nations. Results revealed WPFS is not positively correlated with dissent because employment legislation and economic pressures on organizations influence dissent.…”
Section: Cultural Differences In Expressing Organizational Dissentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hofstede (1980) identified dimensions of cultural variance. Two dimensions pertinent to dissent are individualism/collectivism (IDV/CDV) and power distance (PDI) (Croucher, Parrott, Zeng, & Gomez, 2014). Research has shown IDV/CDV and PDI to be significant predictors of dissent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As workplace freedom of speech has a direct impact on an organization's tolerance for different opinions, a number of studies of the link between workplace freedom of speech and organizational dissent found that higher levels of perceived workplace freedom of speech lead to more articulated dissent and less latent dissent (Garner, 2007;Kassing 2000bKassing , 2006). However, one major limitation of such studies of organizational dissent and workplace freedom of speech is that most have taken place in the U.S. (Croucher et al, 2014;Kassing & Avtgs, 1999). Research has demonstrated results from studies conducted in U.S. settings cannot be generalized to non-U.S. samples.…”
Section: Workplace Freedom Of Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a methodological comparison provides for a more comprehensive understanding of the theoretical nature of these relationships as it can reveal the generalizability of them in more than a U.S. setting (Gudykunst, 2002). This is particularly relevant to dissent research, which with few exceptions (Croucher et al, 2009(Croucher et al, , 2014 has been heavily U.S. based (Kassing, 2011). All three nations fall into the same category of liberal market economies where organizational behaviors are mainly shaped by demand and supply conditions in markets (Hall & Soskice, 2001).…”
Section: National Comparison Between the United States Australia Anmentioning
confidence: 99%