A cross-cultural comparison between South African and British students on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales Third Edition (WAIS-III)

Abstract

There is debate regarding the appropriate use of Western cognitive measures with individuals from very diverse backgrounds to that of the norm population. Given the dated research in this area and the considerable socio-economic changes that South Africa has witnessed over the past 20 years, this paper reports on the use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Third Edition (WAIS-III), the most commonly used measure of intelligence, with an English second language, multilingual, low socio-economic group of black, South African university students. Their performance on the WAIS-III was compared to that of a predominantly white, British, monolingual, higher socio-economic group. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the WAIS-III lacks measurement invariance between the two groups, suggesting that it may be tapping different constructs in each group. The UK group significantly outperformed the SA group on the knowledge-based verbal, and some non-verbal subtests, while the SA group performed significantly better on measures of Processing Speed (PS). The groups did not differ significantly on the Matrix Reasoning subtest and on those working memory subtests with minimal reliance on language, which appear to be the least culturally biased. Group differences were investigated further in a set of principal components analyses, which revealed that the WAIS-III scores loaded differently for the UK and SA groups. While the SA group appeared to treat the PS subtests differently to those measuring perceptual organization and non-verbal reasoning, the UK group seemed to approach all of these subtests similarly. These results have important implications for the cognitive assessment of individuals from culturally, linguistically, and socio-economically diverse circumstances.

The Relationship Between the Striatal Dopaminergic Neuronal and Cognitive Function With Aging

“…No participants reported a total MMSE score of less than 24. The WAIS-III includes 14 subtests, of which 13 were administered (the object assembly subtest was omitted since it does not contribute to the full-scale IQ; Cockcroft et al, 2015). Thirteen age-adjusted subscores were further calculated for verbal comprehension, working memory, perceptual organization and processing speed, Performance IQ (PIQ), Verbal IQ (VIQ), and the full score IQ (FIQ), which is calculated from PIQ and VIQ.…”

Metachromatic leukodystrophy: Characterization of two (p.Leu433Val, p.Gly449Arg)�arylsulfatase A mutations

“…An IQ of 90 is the boundary between normal and low intelligence. The WAIS-III comprises 14 subtests (vocabulary, similarities, information, comprehension, block design, matrix reasoning, picture completion, picture arrangement, coding, symbol search, digit span, letter-number sequencing, arithmetics and object assembly) (27). The Ayres Sensory Integration (ASI) test (28–30) was performed at the age of 7 years 11 months (July, 2017) to assess behavioural problems.…”

Gene expression changes related to immune processes associate with cognitive endophenotypes of schizophrenia

“…Though, the five-factor model in which this cross-loading on latent factor verbal skills was removed, showed lower model fitting statistics (RMSEA = 0.046; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.945; x 2 (66) = 213.44). Here Block design loaded to factors representing both Processing speed and Verbal skills, which may arise from the fact that Block design usually correlates with a broad range of cognitive tasks including processing speed and verbal intelligence (Cockcroft et al, 2015). In general, Block design loads onto the factor representing either visual ability or reasoning (Nuechterlein et al, 2004).…”