2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24148-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Cultural Drive to Innovation: Phronetics from the Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the eligibility criteria, 57 studies were selected and included in the category “Administration and organizations.” The works connected phronesis to the study of organizational or administrative phenomena. The majority of the works were articles, except for two book chapters (Cairns & As‐Saber, 2017; Grant, 2016).…”
Section: Data Search and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using the eligibility criteria, 57 studies were selected and included in the category “Administration and organizations.” The works connected phronesis to the study of organizational or administrative phenomena. The majority of the works were articles, except for two book chapters (Cairns & As‐Saber, 2017; Grant, 2016).…”
Section: Data Search and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works connected phronesis to the study of organizational or administrative phenomena. The majority of the works were articles, except for two book chapters (Cairns & As-Saber, 2017;Grant, 2016).…”
Section: Data S E Arch and Me Thodmentioning
confidence: 99%