2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-entropy method and probabilistic sensitivity analysis framework for calibrating microscopic traffic models

Abstract: ReuseUnless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-entropy method (CEM) originated from an adaptive variance minimization algorithm for estimating the probabilities of rare events on stochastic networks and could be adapted to solve static and noisy combinatorial optimization problems. For further details about CEM and its specific applications in a range of transportation problems, we refer to Maher (2011, 2012); Maher, Liu, and Ngoduy (2013); Abudayyeh, Ngoduy, and Nicholson (2018); Zhong et al (2016).…”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-entropy method (CEM) originated from an adaptive variance minimization algorithm for estimating the probabilities of rare events on stochastic networks and could be adapted to solve static and noisy combinatorial optimization problems. For further details about CEM and its specific applications in a range of transportation problems, we refer to Maher (2011, 2012); Maher, Liu, and Ngoduy (2013); Abudayyeh, Ngoduy, and Nicholson (2018); Zhong et al (2016).…”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the influence of sampling from parameter distributions when generating simulation traces rather than fixing parameter values is additionally evaluated. [8] modeled the Intelligent Driver Model using Gaussian random variables as the parameters to perform a probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on the Kullback-Liebler dissimilarity measure in order to limit the number of parameters requiring value estimation to those yielding the greatest performance improvement relative to default parameter values. [3] advocated for the use of a Bayesian approach to calibration by directly comparing an MCMC-based calibration method with a deterministic optimization method, using one synthetic data set to show that the Bayesian method could recover known parameter values and one real-world data set as a case study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of entropy instead of variance is usually justified by the need to analyze the output random variable with heavy-tail or outliers [13]. SA based on entropy was used to study, for example, traffic flow [13], limit states of load-bearing structures [14,15], the seismic demand of concrete structures [16], and groundwater level [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%