2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross examination of electron transfer rate constants for carbon screen-printed electrodes using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
136
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the presence of rGO in the composite reduced the charge transfer resistance between the counter electrode and the electrolyte solution [7]. The electrochemical rate constant k o (cm·s -1 ) values for the I − /I 3 − couple on the cathodes can be calculated from charge transfer resistance R CE using equation R CE = RT/ðn 2 F 2 AC k o Þ [34,35]. Using this equation, the ratio of k o between two cathodes (I and II) can be calculated via the ratio of…”
Section: Dssc Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the presence of rGO in the composite reduced the charge transfer resistance between the counter electrode and the electrolyte solution [7]. The electrochemical rate constant k o (cm·s -1 ) values for the I − /I 3 − couple on the cathodes can be calculated from charge transfer resistance R CE using equation R CE = RT/ðn 2 F 2 AC k o Þ [34,35]. Using this equation, the ratio of k o between two cathodes (I and II) can be calculated via the ratio of…”
Section: Dssc Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ 416 mV vs the Standard Hydrogen Electrode at pH 7 [25], while the E 0′ for c-type cytochromes is reported at ca. − 200 to 300 mV [26]), as well as for its high electron transfer kinetics at graphite electrodes [27]. We then characterised the bioelectrochemical membrane reactor (BEMR) system in terms of current output and community dynamics and compared the performance with a Control-BES where neither the HFMs nor the mediator was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F = Faraday's constant (96,485 C/mol); A = electrode area (0.07 cm 2 ); T = Temperature (298K); n = number of electrons = 1; C = concentration (5 mM); ϑ = scan rate (0.1 V/s); α = transfer coefficient; Rct = Charge transfer resistance from Nyquist plot. The K 0 value obtained from EIS ( Figure 5(a) red curve) is significantly lower than that from CV (blue curve) because of the electrochemical irreversibility at the electrode-electrolyte interface [16]. The increase in Faradaic impedance after Glu binding shows an almost linear trend in Figure 5(b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%