A cross‐faculty simulation model for authentic learning

Abstract

This paper proposes an inter-disciplinary simulation model for authentic learning that bridges the gap between short group-based simulations within the classroom and longer individual placements in professional working contexts. Dissemination of the model is expected to widen the use of authentic learning approaches in higher education.The model is based on an inter-disciplinary project in which UK higher education students acted as professional developers to produce prototype educational games for academic clients from other subject areas. Perceptions about the project were obtained from interviews with project participants. The stakeholders believed the inter-disciplinary simulation to be a motivating learning experience, whilst identifying possible improvements.To evaluate whether the authenticity of the student-client relationship could be improved, the interview data were compared to four themes for authentic learning described by Rule (2006).The data supported Rule's themes, whilst highlighting the added value gained from metaawareness of the simulation as a learning opportunity.

Considering the Smartphone Learner: developing innovation to investigate the opportunities for students and their interest

“…The study is based upon an undergraduate research assignment in which there are three distinct, yet collaborative, roles: the student researcher designing and undertaking the study; the tutor establishing the framework for the study in terms of a formal assignment; the educational developer with responsibility for promoting innovation in teaching and learning acting as the project sponsor. This maps to a model proposed by Diamond et al (2011) in which the student assumes the role of Developer, the educational developer assumes the role of Client, whilst the tutor"s role is to establish and assess the assignment and to facilitate the Client-Developer relationship. The rationale for this model is to enhance authenticity, giving the student real world responsibility for designing and delivering a piece of work.…”

Authentic research practices throughout the curriculum in undergraduate medical education: Student beliefs and perceptions

“…Findings from Rule's (2006) review study have recently been used in university education to bridge a gap between student learning activities within the classroom and professional settings by revealing four factors that promote authenticity of learning activities (Diamond, Middleton, & Mather, 2011). First, authentic learning experiences are promoted by student engagement in real-world professional problems, targeting a real professional audience.…”

Emerging technologies as cognitive tools for authentic learning

“…Over recent years, there has been much interest in authentic learning in the research and development literature. There are a number of online courses that employ its principles, such as (Reeves, 2006, p. 59) Emerging technologies for authentic learning 609 in media and communication (Collis, Foth & Schroeter, 2009), history (Morrissey, nd), hospitality education (Deale, Elders & Jacques, 2010), legal studies (Barton, McKellar & Maharg, 2007), instructional design (Clinton & Rieber, 2010), literature (Fitzsimmons, 2006), environmental science (Meyers & Nulty, 2009), professional learning (Teräs & Teräs, 2010) and multicultural (Leppisaari, Herrington, Vainio & Im, 2013) and multidisciplinary contexts (Diamond, Middleton & Mather, 2011).…”