A cross-layer MAC protocol for contention reduction and pipelined flow optimization in wireless sensor networks

Singh, Ripudaman; Chouhan, Sonali

doi:10.1109/retis.2015.7232853

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By incorporating the pipelined flow by exploiting parameters such as efficient synchronization, employment of routing layer and hindered sleep/wake scheduling information Singh et al [66] proposed Contention based Synchronous Cross-Layer MAC protocol, (CROP-MAC). Tsuboi et al [67] proposed the multi-channel MAC protocol with cross-layer design and the RPL that degrades the performance as it is a single channel interference in ad-hoc networks they augmented the data transmission as compared to the multi-hop communication. Hsieh et al [68] developed a MAC protocol which is hybrid to energy consumption and latency in WSN's will be minimized.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Efficient Medium Access Control Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks – A Survey

Shruti¹

2019

IJATCSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are not centralized and doesn't have a proper infrastructure that enables it to be the dominant networking solution for major communication demands. Though, a number of efforts have been made to augment WSN routing protocols, however ever-increasing complexity including topological variations, resource constrained environment, event-driven deadline sensitive communication demands alarm for better routing scheme. Amongst major potential solutions optimizing Medium Access Control (MAC) of the standard IEEE 802.15.4 which is default protocol stack of WSN has always been the dominant solution. However, to cope-up with above stated demands augmenting MAC protocol has always been an open and broadened horizon for researchers. With this motivation, in this paper, surveys of numerous recently developed state-of-arts MAC protocols have been presented. In addition to this, different MAC protocols with respective strengths as well as weaknesses have been presented.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Efficient Medium Access Control Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks – A Survey

Shruti¹

2019

IJATCSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This protocol can predict the network traffic to dynamically adjust the duty cycle can save the energy and reduce the delay [13]. In [14]- [21], Synchronization Window (SW) is used to periodically broadcast SYNC packet to maintain synchronization among nodes. In Data transmission Window (DW), data packets are forwarded to its next hop receiver and forward the same further to schedule multi-hop data packet transmission.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Efficient MAC-ROUTE Cross-Layer Technique with Competent Scheduling Duty Cycle Protocol for a Multi-Hop WSN

Prathibhavani¹

2017

JACN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) sensor nodes are compactly placed and the topology of network changes regularly. Sensor nodes are tiny devices limited in power, computation capacity, memory, sensing range and mobility. Because of wireless and specific application nature of Wireless Sensor Network, traditional layered protocol architecture is found to be less efficient, thus need of cross layer design. This paper explores to optimize the energy consumption across physical, MAC and network layers to prolong the life time of WSN. Even though Multi-hop Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (MLEACH) is cross layer protocol uses contention free TDMA as a MAC layer, which is difficult to schedule packets if the network is densely deployed and high contention because of more control overhead and loss of data packets. In this paper, we design and implement Energy efficient MAC-ROUTE cross layer technique with competent scheduling duty cycle to address high contention in dense network by reducing control overhead and loss of data packet called Cross-MLEACH. The given mathematical model and simulation results shows that Cross-MLEACH design optimizes energy consumption across MAC and network layers and provides better performance than MLEACH in terms of network life time and significant delay using MATLAB.

show abstract

“…2, i th (1 ≤ i ≤ N) CFW is represented by CFW i . Size of RQW and a CFW are equal to the SIFS + T RTSD and SIFS + T CTSD , respectively, where T CTSD is the transmission duration of a CTSD packet [8]. In case, a node receives RTSD containing i as the hop distance of the sender from the source of the scheduled flow, it wakes up at the beginning of CFW i+1 to transmit the CTSD to its upstream node as the response of the received RTSD.…”

Section: A Proposed Cycle Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

A low delay cross-layer contention based synchronous MAC protocol for a multi-hop WSN

Singh

Kumar

Bose

2016

2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently designed cross-layer contention based synchronous MAC protocols like the PRMAC protocol, for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) enable a node to schedule multi-hop transmission of multiple data packets in a cycle. However, these systems accommodate both the request-to-send data process and the confirmation-to-send data process in the same data transmission scheduling window (i.e. data window). This reduces the length of the multi-hop flow setup in the data window. In a multi-hop scenario, this degrades both the packet delivery ratio (PDR) and the end-to-end transmission delay (E2ETD). In this paper, we propose a cross-layer contention based synchronous MAC protocol, which accommodates the request-to-send data process in the data window and the confirmation-to-send data process in the sleep window for increased efficiency. We evaluate our proposed protocol through ns-2.35 simulations and compare its performance with the PRMAC protocol. Results suggest that in multi-hop scenario, proposed protocol outperforms PRMAC both in terms of the E2ETD and the packet delivery ratio (PDR). Index TermsEnd-to-end transmission delay, Medium access control (MAC) Protocols, Packet delivery ratio, Synchronization, Wireless sensor networks (WSNs).

show abstract

A cross-layer MAC protocol for contention reduction and pipelined flow optimization in wireless sensor networks

Cited by 14 publications

References 13 publications

Energy Efficient Medium Access Control Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks – A Survey

Energy Efficient Medium Access Control Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks – A Survey

Energy Efficient MAC-ROUTE Cross-Layer Technique with Competent Scheduling Duty Cycle Protocol for a Multi-Hop WSN

A low delay cross-layer contention based synchronous MAC protocol for a multi-hop WSN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About