“…One of these explanations is the role of state-directed development within a broader global economic and political context. As was the case with the world-systems argument above, based on the different needs fulfillment models of Maslow, Alderfer, and Herzberg (see Alderfer, 1972;Herzberg et al, 1959;Maslow, 1943), this would lead to the logical conclusion that workers in cohesive-capitalist and neopatrimonial states with relatively worse working conditions would be more greatly motivated and satisfied by extrinsic workplace factors, while workers in fragmented multi-class states with better working However, many researchers have argued that using OLS regression is appropriate when looking at satisfaction variables on a Likert scale, where most respondents understand that the difference between responses of 1 and 2 is the same as the difference between responses of 2 and 3, and so on (see Handel, 2005;Westover, 2008aWestover, , 2008bWestover, , 2010aWestover, , 2010bWestover, , 2011. Additionally, statist researchers have examined the level of state power and industrialization, the relative level of state embeddedness and autonomy with business interests, the level of bureaucratization, how states build and sustain markets, and state welfare provisions that impact the workplace (Gilpin, 2001;Kohli, 2004;Meyer et al, 1997).…”